On 23.08.2021 21:52:03, tangbin wrote:
On 2021/8/23 20:37, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
quoted
On 23.08.2021 19:33:38, Tang Bin wrote:
quoted
Retrieve OF match data, it's better and cleaner to use
'of_device_get_match_data' over 'of_match_device'.
Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <redacted>
Thanks for the patch!
LGTM, comment inside.
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
quoted
quoted
---
drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
index e254e04ae..3b7465acd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
@@ -279,7 +279,6 @@ static u32 mpc512x_can_get_clock(struct platform_device *ofdev,
static const struct of_device_id mpc5xxx_can_table[];
static int mpc5xxx_can_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
{
- const struct of_device_id *match;
const struct mpc5xxx_can_data *data;
struct device_node *np = ofdev->dev.of_node;
struct net_device *dev;@@ -289,10 +288,9 @@ static int mpc5xxx_can_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
int irq, mscan_clksrc = 0;
int err = -ENOMEM;
- match = of_match_device(mpc5xxx_can_table, &ofdev->dev);
- if (!match)
+ data = of_device_get_match_data(&ofdev->dev);
+ if (!data)
return -EINVAL;
Please remove the "BUG_ON(!data)", which comes later.
For this place, may I send another patch to fix this 'BUG_ON()' by itself,
not in this patch series?
Ok, fine with me.
regards,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |