[PATCH net-next 8/8] net: at91_can: fix the comments style issue
From: Guangbin Huang <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-19 10:00:02
Also in:
lkml, netdev
Subsystem:
can network drivers, the rest · Maintainers:
Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Linus Torvalds
From: Peng Li <redacted> Networking block comments don't use an empty /* line, use /* Comment... Block comments use * on subsequent lines. Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line. This patch fixes the comments style issues. Signed-off-by: Peng Li <redacted> Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <redacted> --- drivers/net/can/at91_can.c | 42 ++++++++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c b/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c
index 0e6ed59a763d..566891312eda 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c@@ -317,8 +317,7 @@ static void at91_setup_mailboxes(struct net_device *dev) unsigned int i; u32 reg_mid; - /* - * Due to a chip bug (errata 50.2.6.3 & 50.3.5.3) the first + /* Due to a chip bug (errata 50.2.6.3 & 50.3.5.3) the first * mailbox is disabled. The next 11 mailboxes are used as a * reception FIFO. The last mailbox is configured with * overwrite option. The overwrite flag indicates a FIFO
@@ -424,8 +423,7 @@ static void at91_chip_stop(struct net_device *dev, enum can_state state) priv->can.state = state; } -/* - * theory of operation: +/* theory of operation: * * According to the datasheet priority 0 is the highest priority, 15 * is the lowest. If two mailboxes have the same priority level the
@@ -487,8 +485,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t at91_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) /* _NOTE_: subtract AT91_MB_TX_FIRST offset from mb! */ can_put_echo_skb(skb, dev, mb - get_mb_tx_first(priv), 0); - /* - * we have to stop the queue and deliver all messages in case + /* we have to stop the queue and deliver all messages in case * of a prio+mb counter wrap around. This is the case if * tx_next buffer prio and mailbox equals 0. *
@@ -799,8 +796,7 @@ static int at91_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int quota) if (reg_sr & get_irq_mb_rx(priv)) work_done += at91_poll_rx(dev, quota - work_done); - /* - * The error bits are clear on read, + /* The error bits are clear on read, * so use saved value from irq handler. */ reg_sr |= priv->reg_sr;
@@ -820,8 +816,7 @@ static int at91_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int quota) return work_done; } -/* - * theory of operation: +/* theory of operation: * * priv->tx_echo holds the number of the oldest can_frame put for * transmission into the hardware, but not yet ACKed by the CAN tx
@@ -850,8 +845,7 @@ static void at91_irq_tx(struct net_device *dev, u32 reg_sr) /* Disable irq for this TX mailbox */ at91_write(priv, AT91_IDR, 1 << mb); - /* - * only echo if mailbox signals us a transfer + /* only echo if mailbox signals us a transfer * complete (MSR_MRDY). Otherwise it's a tansfer * abort. "can_bus_off()" takes care about the skbs * parked in the echo queue.
@@ -866,8 +860,7 @@ static void at91_irq_tx(struct net_device *dev, u32 reg_sr) } } - /* - * restart queue if we don't have a wrap around but restart if + /* restart queue if we don't have a wrap around but restart if * we get a TX int for the last can frame directly before a * wrap around. */
@@ -887,8 +880,7 @@ static void at91_irq_err_state(struct net_device *dev, switch (priv->can.state) { case CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE: - /* - * from: ERROR_ACTIVE + /* from: ERROR_ACTIVE * to : ERROR_WARNING, ERROR_PASSIVE, BUS_OFF * => : there was a warning int */
@@ -904,8 +896,7 @@ static void at91_irq_err_state(struct net_device *dev, } fallthrough; case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING: - /* - * from: ERROR_ACTIVE, ERROR_WARNING + /* from: ERROR_ACTIVE, ERROR_WARNING * to : ERROR_PASSIVE, BUS_OFF * => : error passive int */
@@ -921,8 +912,7 @@ static void at91_irq_err_state(struct net_device *dev, } break; case CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF: - /* - * from: BUS_OFF + /* from: BUS_OFF * to : ERROR_ACTIVE, ERROR_WARNING, ERROR_PASSIVE */ if (new_state <= CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE) {
@@ -942,8 +932,7 @@ static void at91_irq_err_state(struct net_device *dev, /* process state changes depending on the new state */ switch (new_state) { case CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE: - /* - * actually we want to enable AT91_IRQ_WARN here, but + /* actually we want to enable AT91_IRQ_WARN here, but * it screws up the system under certain * circumstances. so just enable AT91_IRQ_ERRP, thus * the "fallthrough"
@@ -1055,8 +1044,7 @@ static void at91_irq_err(struct net_device *dev) priv->can.state = new_state; } -/* - * interrupt handler +/* interrupt handler */ static irqreturn_t at91_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) {
@@ -1077,8 +1065,7 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) /* Receive or error interrupt? -> napi */ if (reg_sr & (get_irq_mb_rx(priv) | AT91_IRQ_ERR_FRAME)) { - /* - * The error bits are clear on read, + /* The error bits are clear on read, * save for later use. */ priv->reg_sr = reg_sr;
@@ -1135,8 +1122,7 @@ static int at91_open(struct net_device *dev) return err; } -/* - * stop CAN bus activity +/* stop CAN bus activity */ static int at91_close(struct net_device *dev) {
--
2.8.1