Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] iplink_can: add new CAN FD bittiming parameters: Transmitter Delay Compensation (TDC)
From: Vincent MAILHOL <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-07 10:35:30
Also in:
lkml, netdev
On Fri. 7 Mai 2021 at 00:50, Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 6 May 2021 20:20:07 +0900 Vincent Mailhol [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
+ if (tb[IFLA_CAN_TDC_TDCV] && tb[IFLA_CAN_TDC_TDCO] && + tb[IFLA_CAN_TDC_TDCF]) { + __u32 *tdcv = RTA_DATA(tb[IFLA_CAN_TDC_TDCV]); + __u32 *tdco = RTA_DATA(tb[IFLA_CAN_TDC_TDCO]); + __u32 *tdcf = RTA_DATA(tb[IFLA_CAN_TDC_TDCF]); + + if (is_json_context()) { + open_json_object("tdc"); + print_int(PRINT_JSON, "tdcv", NULL, *tdcv); + print_int(PRINT_JSON, "tdco", NULL, *tdco); + print_int(PRINT_JSON, "tdcf", NULL, *tdcf); + close_json_object(); + } else { + fprintf(f, "\n tdcv %d tdco %d tdcf %d", + *tdcv, *tdco, *tdcf); + } + } +The most common pattern in iproute2 is to let json/non-json be decided inside the print routine. I search for all instances of fprintf as indication of broken code. Also these are not signed values so please print unsigned. The code should use print_nl() to handle the single line case. Also, there is helper to handle
Thanks for pointing out the issues! For my defence, all the existing code of ip/iplink_can.c shares the exact same issues and I just repeated those without using my brain... I just sent a new v2 which fixes your remarks on both the existing code and the new code introduced in my patch.
Something like:
__u32 tdc = rte_getattr_u32(tb[IFLA_CAN_TDC_TDCV]);
open_json_object("tdc");
print_nl();
print_u32(PRINT_ANY, "tdcv", " tdcv %u", tdcv);There is no print_u32 in iproute2. I guess you meant print_uint(). :) Yours sincerely, Vincent