On 22.03.21 11:28, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:

In commit ea7800565a12 ("can: add optional DLC element to Classical
CAN frame structure") the struct can_frame::can_dlc was put into an
anonymous union with another u8 variable.

For various reasons some members in struct can_frame and canfd_frame
including the first 8 byes of data are expected to have the same
memory layout. This is enforced by a BUILD_BUG_ON check in af_can.c.

Since the above mentioned commit this check fails on at least one compiler
(arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0). Rong Chen analyzed the problem
and found that the union in struct can_frame takes 4 bytes instead of
the expected 1:

| struct can_frame {
|          canid_t                    can_id;               /* 0     4 */
|          union {
|                  __u8               len;                  /* 4     1 */
|                  __u8               can_dlc;              /* 4     1 */
|          };                                               /* 4     4 */
|          __u8                       __pad;                /* 8     1 */
|          __u8                       __res0;               /* 9     1 */
|          __u8                       len8_dlc;             /* 10     1 */
|
|          /* XXX 5 bytes hole, try to pack */
|
|          __u8                       data[8]
| __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); /*    16     8 */
|
|          /* size: 24, cachelines: 1, members: 6 */
|          /* sum members: 19, holes: 1, sum holes: 5 */
|          /* forced alignments: 1, forced holes: 1, sum forced holes: 5 */
|          /* last cacheline: 24 bytes */
| } __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));

Marking the union as packed fixes the problem.

Is this a proper answer to this issue?

Shouldn't this problem cause the developer to update the compiler?

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/f8075a19-10e1-abf9-6d59-1a46454b74b1@hartkopp.net/T/#u (local)

Regards,
Oliver