On 09/15/2015 04:28 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
quoted
+static int sunxican_get_berr_counter(const struct net_device *dev,
+ struct can_berr_counter *bec)
+{
+ struct sunxican_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
+ u32 errors;
+ int err;
+
+ err = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
+ if (err) {
+ netdev_err(dev, "could not enable clock\n");
+ return err;
+ }
Can this function be called if the device is closed? If not, then this
clock calls are useless.
Yes, that's why there are there.
quoted
+ errors = readl(priv->base + SUNXI_REG_ERRC_ADDR);
+
+ bec->txerr = errors & 0xFF;
+ bec->rxerr = (errors >> 16) & 0xFF;
+
+ clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
+
+ return 0;
+}
[...]
quoted
+static int sunxican_open(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ struct sunxican_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
+ int err;
+
+ /* common open */
+ err = open_candev(dev);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ /* register interrupt handler */
+ err = request_irq(dev->irq, sunxi_can_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED,
We don't have any shared interrupt as far as I know, do you really
need this flag?
Not needed, but the IRQ handler properly returns HANDLED or NONE. So
it's better to remove this flag then?
quoted
+ dev->name, dev);
+ if (err) {
+ netdev_err(dev, "request_irq err: %d\n", err);
+ goto exit_irq;
+ }
+
+ /* turn on clocking for CAN peripheral block */
+ err = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
+ if (err) {
+ netdev_err(dev, "could not enable CAN peripheral clock\n");
+ goto exit_clock;
+ }
+
+ err = sunxi_can_start(dev);
+ if (err) {
+ netdev_err(dev, "could not start CAN peripheral\n");
+ goto exit_can_start;
+ }
+
+ can_led_event(dev, CAN_LED_EVENT_OPEN);
+ netif_start_queue(dev);
+
+ return 0;
+
+exit_can_start:
+ clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
+exit_clock:
+ free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
+exit_irq:
+ close_candev(dev);
+ return err;
+}
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |