[PATCH v2 0/4] btrfs: first batch of zoned cleanups · Johannes Thumshirn <hidden> · 2021-12-07
[PATCH v2 1/4] btrfs: zoned: encapsulate inode locking for zoned relocation · Johannes Thumshirn <hidden> · 2021-12-07
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] btrfs: zoned: encapsulate inode locking for zoned relocation · David Sterba <hidden> · 2021-12-07
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] btrfs: zoned: encapsulate inode locking for zoned relocation · Johannes Thumshirn <hidden> · 2021-12-08
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] btrfs: zoned: encapsulate inode locking for zoned relocation · David Sterba <hidden> · 2021-12-08
[PATCH v2 2/4] btrfs: zoned: simplify btrfs_check_meta_write_pointer · Johannes Thumshirn <hidden> · 2021-12-07
[PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: zoned: sink zone check into btrfs_repair_one_zone · Johannes Thumshirn <hidden> · 2021-12-07
[PATCH v2 4/4] btrfs: zoned: it's pointless to check for REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND and btrfs_is_zoned · Johannes Thumshirn <hidden> · 2021-12-07
Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] btrfs: first batch of zoned cleanups · David Sterba <hidden> · 2021-12-07

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] btrfs: zoned: encapsulate inode locking for zoned relocation

From: Johannes Thumshirn <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-08 09:06:19

On 07/12/2021 20:08, David Sterba wrote:

All internal API should use struct btrfs_inode, applied with the
following diff:

Ah ok, good to know. I wanted  to have a bit less pointer casing 
with using 'struct inode'. Anyways I don't mind.

Thanks