Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 4 authors, 2022-02-18

Re: [REGRESSION] 5-10% increase in IO latencies with nohz balance patch

From: Valentin Schneider <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-06 09:48:25
Also in: lkml

On 03/12/21 14:00, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 12:03:27PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
quoted
Could you give the 4 top patches, i.e. those above
8c92606ab810 ("sched/cpuacct: Make user/system times in cpuacct.stat more precise")
a try?

https://git.gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-vs.git -b mainline/sched/nohz-next-update-regression

I gave that a quick test on the platform that caused me to write the patch
you bisected and looks like it didn't break the original fix. If the above
counter-measures aren't sufficient, I'll have to go poke at your
reproducers...
It's better but still around 6% regression.  If I compare these patches to the
average of the last few days worth of runs you're 5% better than before, so
progress but not completely erased.
Hmph, time for me to reproduce this locally then. Thanks!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help