Thread (34 messages) 34 messages, 6 authors, 2021-11-29
STALE1680d
Revisions (2)
  1. v1 current
  2. v2 [diff vs current]

[PATCH 3/3] btrfs: Avoid live-lock in search_ioctl() on hardware with sub-page faults

From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: 2021-11-24 19:20:44
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-fsdevel, lkml
Subsystem: btrfs file system, filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), the rest · Maintainers: Chris Mason, David Sterba, Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Linus Torvalds

Commit a48b73eca4ce ("btrfs: fix potential deadlock in the search
ioctl") addressed a lockdep warning by pre-faulting the user pages and
attempting the copy_to_user_nofault() in an infinite loop. On
architectures like arm64 with MTE, an access may fault within a page at
a location different from what fault_in_writeable() probed. Since the
sk_offset is rewound to the previous struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header
boundary, there is no guaranteed forward progress and search_ioctl() may
live-lock.

Use fault_in_exact_writeable() instead which probes the entire user
buffer for faults at sub-page granularity.

Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 92138ac2a4e2..23167c72fa47 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -2223,7 +2223,8 @@ static noinline int search_ioctl(struct inode *inode,
 
 	while (1) {
 		ret = -EFAULT;
-		if (fault_in_writeable(ubuf + sk_offset, *buf_size - sk_offset))
+		if (fault_in_exact_writeable(ubuf + sk_offset,
+					     *buf_size - sk_offset))
 			break;
 
 		ret = btrfs_search_forward(root, &key, path, sk->min_transid);
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help