Re: [PATCH] fs/btrfs: Make extent item iteration to handle gaps

[PATCH] fs/btrfs: Make extent item iteration to handle gaps · Qu Wenruo <hidden> · 2021-10-16
Re: [PATCH] fs/btrfs: Make extent item iteration to handle gaps · Qu Wenruo <hidden> · 2021-10-28
Re: [PATCH] fs/btrfs: Make extent item iteration to handle gaps · Michael Chang <hidden> · 2021-10-28
Re: [PATCH] fs/btrfs: Make extent item iteration to handle gaps · Qu Wenruo <hidden> · 2021-10-28
Re: [PATCH] fs/btrfs: Make extent item iteration to handle gaps · David Sterba <hidden> · 2021-10-29
Re: [PATCH] fs/btrfs: Make extent item iteration to handle gaps · Daniel Kiper <hidden> · 2021-11-02

From: David Sterba <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-29 12:53:05

On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 03:36:10PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:

Gentle ping?

Without this patch, the new mkfs.btrfs NO_HOLES feature would break any 
kernel/initramfs with hole in it.

Just to clarify, it's not a new feature, it's been out for a long time
(since 3.14).  The new thing is that it's going to be enabled by default
so the potential impact would be higher.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help