Re: Filesystem Read Only due to errno=-28 during metadata allocation
From: <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-19 11:15:59
On 18.10.2021 16:09, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 02:35:39PM +0200, mailing@dmilz.net wrote:quoted
Hello, I faced issue with btrfs FS /var forced to RO due to errno=-28 (no space left). The server was restarted to bring back FS in RW. Before reboot: $ btrfs fi usage /var -m Overall: Device size: 2560.00MiB Device allocated: 2559.00MiB Device unallocated: 1.00MiB Device missing: 0.00MiB Used: 1116.00MiB Free (estimated): 451.25MiB (min: 451.25MiB) Data ratio: 1.00 Metadata ratio: 2.00 Global reserve: 13.00MiB (used: 0.00MiB) Data,single: Size:1559.25MiB, Used:1108.00MiB /dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1559.25MiB Metadata,DUP: Size:467.88MiB, Used:3.94MiB /dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 935.75MiB System,DUP: Size:32.00MiB, Used:0.06MiB /dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 64.00MiB Unallocated: /dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1.00MiBThis is a tiny filesystem, below the minimum practical size for separate data and metadata block groups, but above the size for mixed block groups to be the mkfs default. It might be better to format it with the mixed-bg option.quoted
The FS went RO on Sunday, with this trace: 2021-10-10T00:13:12.790042+02:00 SERVERNAME kernel: BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)[...]quoted
2021-10-10T00:13:12.790124+02:00 SERVERNAME kernel: BTRFS: error (device dm-22) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2353: errno=-28 No space left 2021-10-10T00:13:12.790125+02:00 SERVERNAME kernel: btrfs_printk: 12 callbacks suppressed 2021-10-10T00:13:12.790127+02:00 SERVERNAME kernel: BTRFS info (device dm-22): forced readonly $ btrfs --version btrfs-progs v4.5.3+20160729 $ btrfs fi show /var Label: none uuid: f96f4980-4682-4d2d-8d7a-3c0e2c1c6680 Total devices 1 FS bytes used 1.06GiB devid 1 size 2.50GiB used 2.50GiB path /dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol uname -a Linux SERVERNAME 4.12.14-122.83-default #1 SMP Tue Aug 3 08:37:22 UTC 2021 (c86c48c) ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/LinuxThis kernel is 4 years old. It may have additional practical problems in the implementation beyond the design-level issues I've described here.quoted
On the previous Friday after weekly balance: btrfs fi usage /var Overall: Device size: 2.50GiB Device allocated: 1.73GiB Device unallocated: 792.75MiB Device missing: 0.00B Used: 1.09GiB Free (estimated): 1.11GiB (min: 739.62MiB) Data ratio: 1.00 Metadata ratio: 2.00 Global reserve: 13.00MiB (used: 0.00B) Data,single: Size:1.41GiB, Used:1.08GiB /dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1.41GiB Metadata,DUP: Size:128.00MiB, Used:3.94MiB /dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 256.00MiB System,DUP: Size:32.00MiB, Used:64.00KiB /dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 64.00MiB Unallocated: /dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 792.75MiB I don't have extract of btrfs fi usage /var command during the weekend, but a script is extracting the Space allocated ("Size") and Used in Data and Metadata. I observed twice during the weekend space allocated to metadata is suddenly growing while the metadata used remains the same. The first time I had enough "Device unallocated" and no problem was observed, the second (on Sunday after midnight), it leads to FS RO (no space left). Is there any situation that can lead to metadata allocation but without actual usage of metadata?Some btrfs maintenance operations lock block groups to prevent concurrent modification, such as balance, scrub, and discard. When this occurs, any free space that has been allocated in the metadata block groups is temporarily unavailable, and if there's no free space in any other block group, then btrfs will need to allocate another metadata block group to continue. (The same happens with data block groups but the impact is smaller due to the much larger data sizes.) The worst case for metadata on a normal filesystem is: raid_profile_redundancy (2 for dup metadata) * ( chunk_size (usually 1GB) * ( number_of_disks (for scrub) + 1 (for discard) + 1 (for balance) ) + global_reserve (up to 512MB) ) i.e. on a single-disk filesystem with dup metadata, there should be at least 7GB allocated or available for metadata (3.5GB dup metadata takes 7GB of raw space, you can have either the 3.5GB allocated-but-free metadata or 7GB unallocated, or any combination totalling at least 7GB). Obviously, keeping 7GB reserved for metadata doesn't work on a device that is only 2.5GB to start with. Even if you elect not to use discard or scrub, you'd still need 2.5GB for dup metadata.
Since this incident, the FS has been extended to 5GB. But in our case the chunk size for metadata is 128MB, so: 2 [dup metadata] * ( 128 * ( 1 [disk] + 1 [discard] + 1 [balance] ) + 512 [Global Reserve] ) = 1792 MB ?
btrfs has two ways to deal with this: mixed block groups (mixed-bg mkfs option), which puts all the space into a single pool with no distinction between data and metadata, and reducing block group chunk size for non-mixed-bg filesystems. On a filesystem this size, the block groups use 128MB chunks instead of 1GB. Global reserve is also reduced (it is computed based on device size and capped at 512MB). In this case, the worst case metadata free space requirement is 128MB chunk size * (1 disk + 2) + global_reserve which works out to 397MB of free metadata space or 794MB of unallocated space with dup metadata. You have 467MB allocated to metadata and most of it is free space, which is theoretically enough, but if you count space in terms of block groups, it's exactly full--if the first 3 block groups are locked, the 4th block group is the last one where space might be allocated, and it's an odd size so it might not be large enough.
From obervation the last chunk allocated is not reported as totally used, so I see size for data/metdata as "odd size" (not an integer number of chunks).
Mixed block groups (mixed-bg mkfs option) put all the space is in a single pot that can be allocated to metadata or data blocks as needed. This is the default for filesystems below 1GB, but it's a good idea to use mixed-bg for larger filesystems as well because the metadata block group locking cost is so high relative to the filesystem size. While it's possible to use non-mixed block groups on a filesystem that has only a few GB, it's not possible to use a significant number of btrfs features, including scrub, balance, RAID disk replacement, online conversion to other RAID profiles, device shrink, or discard, due to the requirement to have an extra unlocked block group with available free space during these operations.
Last weekend I had the same behavior, the size allocated to metadata
went from 128MB to up to 768MB, so up to 6 * 12* MB metadata but the
metdata usage didn't grow:
### Sat Oct 16 23:59:57 CEST 2021
Overall:
Device size: 5120.00MiB
Device allocated: 2647.25MiB
Device unallocated: 2472.75MiB
Device missing: 0.00MiB
Used: 1097.75MiB
Free (estimated): 2942.38MiB (min:
1706.00MiB)
Data ratio: 1.00
Metadata ratio: 2.00
Global reserve: 13.00MiB (used: 0.00MiB)
Data,single: Size:1559.25MiB, Used:1089.62MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1559.25MiB
Metadata,DUP: Size:512.00MiB, Used:4.00MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1024.00MiB
System,DUP: Size:32.00MiB, Used:0.06MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 64.00MiB
Unallocated:
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 2472.75MiB
### Sun Oct 17 00:00:32 CEST 2021
Overall:
Device size: 5120.00MiB
Device allocated: 2903.25MiB
Device unallocated: 2216.75MiB
Device missing: 0.00MiB
Used: 1097.44MiB
Free (estimated): 2686.69MiB (min:
1578.31MiB)
Data ratio: 1.00
Metadata ratio: 2.00
Global reserve: 13.00MiB (used: 0.00MiB)
Data,single: Size:1559.25MiB, Used:1089.31MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1559.25MiB
Metadata,DUP: Size:640.00MiB, Used:4.00MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1280.00MiB
System,DUP: Size:32.00MiB, Used:0.06MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 64.00MiB
Unallocated:
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 2216.75MiB
### Sun Oct 17 00:05:27 CEST 2021
Overall:
Device size: 5120.00MiB
Device allocated: 2903.25MiB
Device unallocated: 2216.75MiB
Device missing: 0.00MiB
Used: 1099.69MiB
Free (estimated): 2684.44MiB (min:
1576.06MiB)
Data ratio: 1.00
Metadata ratio: 2.00
Global reserve: 13.00MiB (used: 0.00MiB)
Data,single: Size:1559.25MiB, Used:1091.56MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1559.25MiB
Metadata,DUP: Size:640.00MiB, Used:4.00MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1280.00MiB
System,DUP: Size:32.00MiB, Used:0.06MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 64.00MiB
Unallocated:
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 2216.75MiB
### Sun Oct 17 00:05:32 CEST 2021
Overall:
Device size: 5120.00MiB
Device allocated: 3159.25MiB
Device unallocated: 1960.75MiB
Device missing: 0.00MiB
Used: 1100.25MiB
Free (estimated): 2427.88MiB (min:
1447.50MiB)
Data ratio: 1.00
Metadata ratio: 2.00
Global reserve: 13.00MiB (used: 0.00MiB)
Data,single: Size:1559.25MiB, Used:1092.12MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1559.25MiB
Metadata,DUP: Size:768.00MiB, Used:4.00MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1536.00MiB
System,DUP: Size:32.00MiB, Used:0.06MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 64.00MiB
Unallocated:
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1960.75MiB
### Sun Oct 17 00:12:53 CEST 2021
Overall:
Device size: 5120.00MiB
Device allocated: 3159.25MiB
Device unallocated: 1960.75MiB
Device missing: 0.00MiB
Used: 1100.62MiB
Free (estimated): 2427.50MiB (min:
1447.12MiB)
Data ratio: 1.00
Metadata ratio: 2.00
Global reserve: 13.00MiB (used: 0.00MiB)
Data,single: Size:1559.25MiB, Used:1092.50MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1559.25MiB
Metadata,DUP: Size:768.00MiB, Used:4.00MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1536.00MiB
System,DUP: Size:32.00MiB, Used:0.06MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 64.00MiB
Unallocated:
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1960.75MiB
### Sun Oct 17 00:12:58 CEST 2021
Overall:
Device size: 5120.00MiB
Device allocated: 2903.25MiB
Device unallocated: 2216.75MiB
Device missing: 0.00MiB
Used: 1100.69MiB
Free (estimated): 2683.44MiB (min:
1575.06MiB)
Data ratio: 1.00
Metadata ratio: 2.00
Global reserve: 13.00MiB (used: 0.12MiB)
Data,single: Size:1559.25MiB, Used:1092.56MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1559.25MiB
Metadata,DUP: Size:640.00MiB, Used:4.00MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 1280.00MiB
System,DUP: Size:32.00MiB, Used:0.06MiB
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 64.00MiB
Unallocated:
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varvol 2216.75MiB
So if I understand properly it might be due to chunk being needed for
balance/discard or scrub.
Is there 3rd party tools which are also able to lock metadata block
group as well? It seems to happens at the same time, when backup is
running (spectrum), and/or HANA backup and/or ReaR backup as well.