Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2021-08-26

Re: [PATCH v3] btrfs: reflink: Initialize return value to 0 in btrfs_extent_same()

From: Filipe Manana <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-26 15:11:51

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 3:44 PM Sidong Yang [off-list ref] wrote:
This patch fixes a warning reported by smatch. It reported that ret
could be returned without initialized. 0 would be proper value for
initializing ret. Because dedupe operations are supposed to to return
0 for a 0 length range.

Signed-off-by: Sidong Yang <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <redacted>

Looks good, thanks.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
v2:
 - Removed assert and added initializing ret
v3:
 - Changed initializing value to 0
---
 fs/btrfs/reflink.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/reflink.c b/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
index 9b0814318e72..c71e49782e86 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
@@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same_range(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 len,
 static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
                             struct inode *dst, u64 dst_loff)
 {
-       int ret;
+       int ret = 0;
        u64 i, tail_len, chunk_count;
        struct btrfs_root *root_dst = BTRFS_I(dst)->root;

--
2.25.1

-- 
Filipe David Manana,

“Whether you think you can, or you think you can't — you're right.”
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help