Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 5 authors, 2021-09-28

Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] btrfs: delay blkdev_put until after the device remove

From: Anand Jain <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-25 01:00:47

On 28/07/2021 05:01, Josef Bacik wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
When removing the device we call blkdev_put() on the device once we've
removed it, and because we have an EXCL open we need to take the
->open_mutex on the block device to clean it up.  Unfortunately during
device remove we are holding the sb writers lock, which results in the
following lockdep splat

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.14.0-rc2+ #407 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
losetup/11595 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff973ac35dd138 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0

but task is already holding lock:
ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop]

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
        __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750
        lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop]
        blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0
        blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0
        blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0
        do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390
        path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20
        do_filp_open+0x96/0x120
        do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130
        __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70
        do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
        __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750
        blkdev_put+0x3a/0x220
        btrfs_rm_device.cold+0x62/0xe5
        btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70
        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
        do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}:
        lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop]
        loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop]
        process_one_work+0x26b/0x560
        worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
        kthread+0x140/0x160
        ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        process_one_work+0x245/0x560
        worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
        kthread+0x140/0x160
        ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90
        lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
        flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0
        drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
        destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
        __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop]
        block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
        do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
   (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
                                lock(&disk->open_mutex);
                                lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
   lock((wq_completion)loop0);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by losetup/11595:
  #0: ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop]

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 11595 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #407
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
  dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
  check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
  ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50
  __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90
  lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
  ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0
  ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220
  flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0
  ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0
  ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100
  drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
  destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
  __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop]
  ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0
  block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7fc21255d4cb

So instead save the bdev and do the put once we've dropped the sb
writers lock in order to avoid the lockdep recursion.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
---
  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c   | 17 ++++++++++++++---
  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
  fs/btrfs/volumes.h |  3 ++-
  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 0ba98e08a029..fabbfdfa56f5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -3205,6 +3205,8 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev_v2(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
  	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
  	struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args_v2 *vol_args;
+	struct block_device *bdev = NULL;
+	fmode_t mode;
  	int ret;
  	bool cancel = false;
  
@@ -3237,9 +3239,11 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev_v2(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
  	/* Exclusive operation is now claimed */
  
  	if (vol_args->flags & BTRFS_DEVICE_SPEC_BY_ID)
-		ret = btrfs_rm_device(fs_info, NULL, vol_args->devid);
+		ret = btrfs_rm_device(fs_info, NULL, vol_args->devid, &bdev,
+				      &mode);
  	else
-		ret = btrfs_rm_device(fs_info, vol_args->name, 0);
+		ret = btrfs_rm_device(fs_info, vol_args->name, 0, &bdev,
+				      &mode);
  
  	btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info);
  
@@ -3255,6 +3259,8 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev_v2(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
  	kfree(vol_args);
  err_drop:
  	mnt_drop_write_file(file);
+	if (bdev)
+		blkdev_put(bdev, mode);
  	return ret;
  }
  
@@ -3263,6 +3269,8 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
  	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
  	struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args *vol_args;
+	struct block_device *bdev = NULL;
+	fmode_t mode;
  	int ret;
  	bool cancel;
  
@@ -3284,7 +3292,8 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
  	ret = exclop_start_or_cancel_reloc(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_DEV_REMOVE,
  					   cancel);
  	if (ret == 0) {
-		ret = btrfs_rm_device(fs_info, vol_args->name, 0);
+		ret = btrfs_rm_device(fs_info, vol_args->name, 0, &bdev,
+				      &mode);
  		if (!ret)
  			btrfs_info(fs_info, "disk deleted %s", vol_args->name);
  		btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info);
@@ -3294,6 +3303,8 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
  out_drop_write:
  	mnt_drop_write_file(file);
  
+	if (bdev)
+		blkdev_put(bdev, mode);
  	return ret;
  }
  
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 3ab6c78e6eb2..f622e93a6ff1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -2076,7 +2076,7 @@ void btrfs_scratch_superblocks(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
  }
  
  int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *device_path,
-		    u64 devid)
+		    u64 devid, struct block_device **bdev, fmode_t *mode)
  {
  	struct btrfs_device *device;
  	struct btrfs_fs_devices *cur_devices;
@@ -2186,15 +2186,26 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *device_path,
  	mutex_unlock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
  
  	/*
-	 * at this point, the device is zero sized and detached from
+	 * At this point, the device is zero sized and detached from
  	 * the devices list.  All that's left is to zero out the old
  	 * supers and free the device.
+	 *
+	 * We cannot call btrfs_close_bdev() here because we're holding the sb
+	 * write lock, and blkdev_put() will pull in the ->open_mutex on the
+	 * block device and it's dependencies.  Instead just flush the device
+	 * and let the caller do the final blkdev_put.
  	 */
-	if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state))
+	if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state)) {
  		btrfs_scratch_superblocks(fs_info, device->bdev,
  					  device->name->str);
+		if (device->bdev) {
+			sync_blockdev(device->bdev);
+			invalidate_bdev(device->bdev);
+		}
+	}
  
-	btrfs_close_bdev(device);
+	*bdev = device->bdev;
+	*mode = device->mode;
  	synchronize_rcu();
  	btrfs_free_device(device);
  
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index 70c749eee3ad..cc70e54cb901 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -472,7 +472,8 @@ struct btrfs_device *btrfs_alloc_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
  					const u8 *uuid);
  void btrfs_free_device(struct btrfs_device *device);
  int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
-		    const char *device_path, u64 devid);
+		    const char *device_path, u64 devid,
+		    struct block_device **bdev, fmode_t *mode);
  void __exit btrfs_cleanup_fs_uuids(void);
  int btrfs_num_copies(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 logical, u64 len);
  int btrfs_grow_device(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,

LGTM

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <redacted>

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help