Re: the major/minor value of statx(kernel samples/vfs/test-statx.c) does not match /usr/bin/stat
From: David Sterba <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-23 20:52:05
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 06:12:56PM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote:
the major/minor value of statx(kernel samples/vfs/test-statx.c) does not match /usr/bin/stat. major/minor of statx result seems be truncated by something like old_decode_dev()?
I've checked the code first, both stat/statx seem to be doing the same thing.
[root@T640 vfs]# ./test-statx /ssd/ statx(/ssd/) = 0 results=1fff Size: 200 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 directory Device: 00:31 Inode: 256 Links: 1
So Device is 00:31, printed as two fields in hex.
Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x) Uid: 0 Gid: 0 Access: 2021-06-16 19:16:56.644344956+0800 Modify: 2021-05-06 16:14:33.676248229+0800 Change: 2021-05-06 16:14:33.676248229+0800 Birth: 2020-11-18 14:03:35.324915316+0800 Attributes: 0000000000002000 (........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ..-..... ..?-.... .---.-..) [root@T640 vfs]# stat /ssd/ File: ‘/ssd/’ Size: 200 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 directory Device: 31h/49d Inode: 256 Links: 1
And here it's also 31, the 'h' suffix means it's hexadecimal and "49d" si the same value in decimal.
Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root) Access: 2021-06-16 19:16:56.644344956 +0800 Modify: 2021-05-06 16:14:33.676248229 +0800 Change: 2021-05-06 16:14:33.676248229 +0800 Birth: - vfat output sample: [root@T640 vfs]# ./test-statx /boot/efi/ statx(/boot/efi/) = 0 results=17ff Size: 4096 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 directory Device: 08:01 Inode: 1 Links: 3
08:01
Access: (0700/drwx------) Uid: 0 Gid: 0 Access: 1970-01-01 08:00:00.000000000+0800 Modify: 1970-01-01 08:00:00.000000000+0800 Change: 1970-01-01 08:00:00.000000000+0800 Attributes: 0000000000002000 (........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ..-..... ..?-.... ........) [root@T640 vfs]# stat /boot/efi/ File: ‘/boot/efi/’ Size: 4096 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 directory Device: 801h/2049d Inode: 1 Links: 3
801h == 0801h the same value, so it's just a matter of formatting the output and the values are indeed the same. If you change the format in test-statx.c to "%2xh/%2dd" and the value to "(stx->stx_dev_major << 8) + stx->stx_dev_minor", the output is exactly the same.