Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 9 authors, 2021-05-21

Re: [PATCH] btrfs: scrub: per-device bandwidth control

From: David Sterba <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-21 15:19:00
Also in: lkml

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:14:03PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 9:43 AM Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 18 May 2021, David Sterba wrote:
quoted
+     /* Start new epoch, set deadline */
+     now = ktime_get();
+     if (sctx->throttle_deadline == 0) {
+             sctx->throttle_deadline = ktime_add_ms(now, time_slice / div);
ERROR: modpost: "__udivdi3" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined!

div_u64(bwlimit, div)
If 'time_slice' is in nanoseconds, the best interface to use
is ktime_divns().
It's in miliseconds and the division above is int/int, the problematic
one is below.
quoted
quoted
+             sctx->throttle_sent = 0;
+     }
+
+     /* Still in the time to send? */
+     if (ktime_before(now, sctx->throttle_deadline)) {
+             /* If current bio is within the limit, send it */
+             sctx->throttle_sent += sbio->bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
+             if (sctx->throttle_sent <= bwlimit / div)
+                     return;
Doesn't this also need to be changed?
quoted
quoted
+             /* We're over the limit, sleep until the rest of the slice */
+             delta = ktime_ms_delta(sctx->throttle_deadline, now);
+     } else {
+             /* New request after deadline, start new epoch */
+             delta = 0;
+     }
+
+     if (delta)
+             schedule_timeout_interruptible(delta * HZ / 1000);
ERROR: modpost: "__divdi3" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined!

I'm a bit surprised gcc doesn't emit code for the division by the
constant 1000, but emits a call to __divdi3().  So this has to become
div_u64(), too.
There is schedule_hrtimeout(), which takes a ktime_t directly
but has slightly different behavior. There is also an msecs_to_jiffies
helper that should produce a fast division.
I'll use msecs_to_jiffies, thanks. If 'hr' in schedule_hrtimeout stands
for high resolution, it's not necessary here.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help