Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Remove force argument from run_delalloc_nocow()
From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-24 20:03:05
On 19:56 24/02, David Sterba wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 07:17:49AM -0600, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:quoted
force_nocow can be calculated by btrfs_inode and does not need to be passed as an argument. This simplifies run_delalloc_nocow() call from btrfs_run_delalloc_range() where should_nocow() checks for BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM and BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC flags or if EXTENT_DEFRAG flags are set. should_nocow() has been re-arranged so EXTENT_DEFRAG has higher priority in checks.Why is that? In the check sequence, test_range_bit is called first but that's more expensive as it needs to iterate the range.
The test_range() is conditional and short-circuited by inode->defrag_bytes. So, the worst case scenario would be when defrag_bytes > 0, and EXTENT_DEFRAG is not set for the range. I did it for readability, but if you think need_force_cow() is faster, I am fine with keeping it.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <redacted> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 28 +++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 4f2f1e932751..2115d8cc6f18 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c@@ -1516,7 +1516,7 @@ static int fallback_to_cow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page *locked_page, static noinline int run_delalloc_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page *locked_page, const u64 start, const u64 end, - int *page_started, int force, + int *page_started, unsigned long *nr_written) { struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info;@@ -1530,6 +1530,7 @@ static noinline int run_delalloc_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 ino = btrfs_ino(inode); bool nocow = false; u64 disk_bytenr = 0; + bool force = inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW; path = btrfs_alloc_path(); if (!path) {@@ -1863,13 +1864,9 @@ static noinline int run_delalloc_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, return ret; } -static inline int need_force_cow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end) +static inline bool should_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end) { - if (!(inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW) && - !(inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC)) - return 0; - /* * @defrag_bytes is a hint value, no spinlock held here, * if is not zero, it means the file is defragging.@@ -1877,9 +1874,15 @@ static inline int need_force_cow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end) */ if (inode->defrag_bytes && test_range_bit(&inode->io_tree, start, end, EXTENT_DEFRAG, 0, NULL)) - return 1; + return false; - return 0; + if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW) + return true; + + if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC) + return true;So here it needs to do test_range_bit first, while before the two checks were fast path.quoted
+ + return false; } /*@@ -1891,17 +1894,12 @@ int btrfs_run_delalloc_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page *locked_page struct writeback_control *wbc) { int ret; - int force_cow = need_force_cow(inode, start, end); const bool zoned = btrfs_is_zoned(inode->root->fs_info); - if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW && !force_cow) { - ASSERT(!zoned); - ret = run_delalloc_nocow(inode, locked_page, start, end, - page_started, 1, nr_written); - } else if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC && !force_cow) { + if (should_nocow(inode, start, end)) { ASSERT(!zoned); ret = run_delalloc_nocow(inode, locked_page, start, end, - page_started, 0, nr_written); + page_started, nr_written);Merging the two calls into one branch makes sense so that all the reasons for 'nocow' are in one helper, so ok.quoted
} else if (!inode_can_compress(inode) || !inode_need_compress(inode, start, end)) { if (zoned) -- 2.30.1
-- Goldwyn