Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 6 authors, 2021-03-01

Re: page->index limitation on 32bit system?

flat view

From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-02-18 13:01:36
Also in: linux-fsdevel

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 04:54:46PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Recently we got a strange bug report that, one 32bit systems like armv6
or non-64bit x86, certain large btrfs can't be mounted.

It turns out that, since page->index is just unsigned long, and on 32bit
systemts, that can just be 32bit.

And when filesystems is utilizing any page offset over 4T, page->index
get truncated, causing various problems.
4TB?  I think you mean 16TB (4kB * 4GB)

Yes, this is a known limitation.  Some vendors have gone to the trouble
of introducing a new page_index_t.  I'm not convinced this is a problem
worth solving.  There are very few 32-bit systems with this much storage
on a single partition (everything should work fine if you take a 20TB
drive and partition it into two 10TB partitions).

As usual, the best solution is for people to stop buying 32-bit systems.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help