Re: [PATCH v15 43/43] btrfs: zoned: deal with holes writing out tree-log pages
From: Filipe Manana <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-05 22:46:19
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 12:55 PM Naohiro Aota [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:49:05AM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote:quoted
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 9:26 AM Naohiro Aota [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Since the zoned filesystem requires sequential write out of metadata, we cannot proceed with a hole in tree-log pages. When such a hole exists, btree_write_cache_pages() will return -EAGAIN. We cannot wait for the range to be written, because it will cause a deadlock. So, let's bail out to a full commit in this case. Cc: Filipe Manana <redacted> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> --- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) This patch solves a regression introduced by fixing patch 40. I'm sorry for the confusing patch numbering.Hum, how does patch 40 can cause this? And is it before the fixup or after?With pre-5.10 code base + zoned series at that time, it passed xfstests without this patch. With current code base + zoned series without the fixup for patch 40, it also passed the tests, because we are mostly bailing out to a full commit. The fixup now stressed the new fsync code on zoned mode and revealed an issue to have -EAGAIN from btrfs_write_marked_extents(). This error happens when a concurrent transaction commit is writing a dirty extent in this tree-log commit. This issue didn't occur previously because of a longer critical section, I guess.
Ok, if I understand you correctly, the problem is a transaction commit and an fsync both allocating metadata extents at the same time.
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c index 4e72794342c0..629e605cd62d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c@@ -3120,6 +3120,14 @@ int btrfs_sync_log(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, */ blk_start_plug(&plug); ret = btrfs_write_marked_extents(fs_info, &log->dirty_log_pages, mark); + /* + * There is a hole writing out the extents and cannot proceed it on + * zoned filesystem, which require sequential writing. We canrequire -> requiresquoted
+ * ignore the error for now, since we don't wait for completion for + * now.So why can we ignore the error for now? Why not just bail out here and mark the log for full commit? (without a transaction abort)As described above, -EAGAIN happens when a concurrent process writes out an extent buffer of this tree-log commit. This concurrent write out will fill a hole for us, so the next write out might succeed. Indeed we can bail out here, but I opted to try the next write.
Ok, if I understand you correctly, you mean it will be fine if after this point no one allocates metadata extents from the hole? I think such a clear explanation would fit nicely in the comment. Thanks.
quoted
quoted
+ */ + if (ret == -EAGAIN) + ret = 0; if (ret) { blk_finish_plug(&plug); btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);@@ -3229,7 +3237,16 @@ int btrfs_sync_log(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, &log_root_tree->dirty_log_pages, EXTENT_DIRTY | EXTENT_NEW); blk_finish_plug(&plug); - if (ret) { + /* + * There is a hole in the extents, and failed to sequential write + * on zoned filesystem. We cannot wait for this write outs, sinc itthis -> thesequoted
+ * cause a deadlock. Bail out to the full commit, instead. + */ + if (ret == -EAGAIN) { + btrfs_wait_tree_log_extents(log, mark); + mutex_unlock(&log_root_tree->log_mutex); + goto out_wake_log_root;Must also call btrfs_set_log_full_commit(trans);Oops, I missed this one.quoted
Thanks.quoted
+ } else if (ret) { btrfs_set_log_full_commit(trans); btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); mutex_unlock(&log_root_tree->log_mutex); -- 2.30.0-- Filipe David Manana, “Whether you think you can, or you think you can't — you're right.”
-- Filipe David Manana, “Whether you think you can, or you think you can't — you're right.”