Re: [PATCH v4 08/18] btrfs: introduce helper for subpage uptodate status
From: Qu Wenruo <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-21 05:13:18
On 2021/1/21 上午9:28, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 1/20/21 7:49 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:quoted
On 2021/1/20 下午11:00, Josef Bacik wrote:quoted
On 1/16/21 2:15 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:quoted
This patch introduce the following functions to handle btrfs subpage uptodate status: - btrfs_subpage_set_uptodate() - btrfs_subpage_clear_uptodate() - btrfs_subpage_test_uptodate() Those helpers can only be called when the range is ensured to be inside the page. - btrfs_page_set_uptodate() - btrfs_page_clear_uptodate() - btrfs_page_test_uptodate() Those helpers can handle both regular sector size and subpage without problem. Although caller should still ensure that the range is inside the page. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <redacted> --- fs/btrfs/subpage.h | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 115 insertions(+)diff --git a/fs/btrfs/subpage.h b/fs/btrfs/subpage.h index d8b34879368d..3373ef4ffec1 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/subpage.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/subpage.h@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@struct btrfs_subpage { /* Common members for both data and metadata pages */ spinlock_t lock; + u16 uptodate_bitmap; union { /* Structures only used by metadata */ bool under_alloc;@@ -78,4 +79,118 @@ static inline voidbtrfs_page_end_meta_alloc(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int btrfs_attach_subpage(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct page *page); void btrfs_detach_subpage(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct page *page); +/* + * Convert the [start, start + len) range into a u16 bitmap + * + * E.g. if start == page_offset() + 16K, len = 16K, we get 0x00f0. + */ +static inline u16 btrfs_subpage_calc_bitmap(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, + struct page *page, u64 start, u32 len) +{ + int bit_start = offset_in_page(start) >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits; + int nbits = len >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits; + + /* Basic checks */ + ASSERT(PagePrivate(page) && page->private); + ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(start, fs_info->sectorsize) && + IS_ALIGNED(len, fs_info->sectorsize)); + + /* + * The range check only works for mapped page, we can + * still have unampped page like dummy extent buffer pages. + */ + if (page->mapping) + ASSERT(page_offset(page) <= start && + start + len <= page_offset(page) + PAGE_SIZE); + /* + * Here nbits can be 16, thus can go beyond u16 range. Here we make the + * first left shift to be calculated in unsigned long (u32), then + * truncate the result to u16. + */ + return (u16)(((1UL << nbits) - 1) << bit_start); +} + +static inline void btrfs_subpage_set_uptodate(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, + struct page *page, u64 start, u32 len) +{ + struct btrfs_subpage *subpage = (struct btrfs_subpage *)page->private; + u16 tmp = btrfs_subpage_calc_bitmap(fs_info, page, start, len); + unsigned long flags; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&subpage->lock, flags); + subpage->uptodate_bitmap |= tmp; + if (subpage->uptodate_bitmap == U16_MAX) + SetPageUptodate(page); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&subpage->lock, flags); +} + +static inline void btrfs_subpage_clear_uptodate(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, + struct page *page, u64 start, u32 len) +{ + struct btrfs_subpage *subpage = (struct btrfs_subpage *)page->private; + u16 tmp = btrfs_subpage_calc_bitmap(fs_info, page, start, len); + unsigned long flags; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&subpage->lock, flags); + subpage->uptodate_bitmap &= ~tmp; + ClearPageUptodate(page); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&subpage->lock, flags); +} + +/* + * Unlike set/clear which is dependent on each page status, for test all bits + * are tested in the same way. + */ +#define DECLARE_BTRFS_SUBPAGE_TEST_OP(name) \ +static inline bool btrfs_subpage_test_##name(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, \ + struct page *page, u64 start, u32 len) \ +{ \ + struct btrfs_subpage *subpage = (struct btrfs_subpage *)page->private; \ + u16 tmp = btrfs_subpage_calc_bitmap(fs_info, page, start, len); \ + unsigned long flags; \ + bool ret; \ + \ + spin_lock_irqsave(&subpage->lock, flags); \ + ret = ((subpage->name##_bitmap & tmp) == tmp); \ + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&subpage->lock, flags); \ + return ret; \ +} +DECLARE_BTRFS_SUBPAGE_TEST_OP(uptodate); + +/* + * Note that, in selftest, especially extent-io-tests, we can have empty + * fs_info passed in. + * Thankfully in selftest, we only test sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE cases so far, + * thus we can fall back to regular sectorsize branch. + */ +#define DECLARE_BTRFS_PAGE_OPS(name, set_page_func, clear_page_func, \ + test_page_func) \ +static inline void btrfs_page_set_##name(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, \ + struct page *page, u64 start, u32 len) \ +{ \ + if (unlikely(!fs_info) || fs_info->sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE) { \ + set_page_func(page); \ + return; \ + } \ + btrfs_subpage_set_##name(fs_info, page, start, len); \ +} \ +static inline void btrfs_page_clear_##name(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, \ + struct page *page, u64 start, u32 len) \ +{ \ + if (unlikely(!fs_info) || fs_info->sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE) { \ + clear_page_func(page); \ + return; \ + } \ + btrfs_subpage_clear_##name(fs_info, page, start, len); \ +} \ +static inline bool btrfs_page_test_##name(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, \ + struct page *page, u64 start, u32 len) \ +{ \ + if (unlikely(!fs_info) || fs_info->sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE) \ + return test_page_func(page); \ + return btrfs_subpage_test_##name(fs_info, page, start, len); \ +}Another thing I just realized is you're doing this btrfs_page_set_uptodate(fs_info, page, eb->start, eb->len); but we default to a nodesize > PAGE_SIZE on x86. This is fine, because you're checking fs_info->sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE, which will mean we do the right thing. But what happens if fs_info->nodesize < PAGE_SIZE && fs_info->sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE? We by default have fs'es that ->nodesize != ->sectorsize, so really what we should be doing is checking if len == PAGE_SIZE here, but then you need to take into account the case that eb->len > PAGE_SIZE. Fix this to do the right thing in either of those cases. Thanks,Impossible. Nodesize must be >= sectorsize. As sectorsize is currently the minimal access unit for both data and metadata.Ok the consider the alternative, we have PAGE_SIZE == 64k, nodesize == 64k and sectorsize == 4k, something that's actually allowed. You're now doing the subpage operations on something that won't/shouldn't have the subpage private attached to the page. We need to key off of the right thing, so for metadata we need to check ->nodesize, and data we check ->sectorsize, and for these accessors you can simply do len >= PAGE_SIZE. Thanks.
For nodesize == 64K and sectorsize == 4K, subpage way of handling it still works. eb->len == 64K now, btrfs_page_set_uptodate() for subpage will just mark the full page uptodate. I tend not to make the nodesize == 64K a special case, or the check condition will be a mess. Now we unify the check to just sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE, nothing else to bother. Thanks, Qu
Josef