Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: Correct value printed by assertions/BUG_ON/WARN_ON
From: Qu Wenruo <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-06 02:03:22
BTW, the DISABLE_BACKTRACE branch seems quite different from backtrace one. #define BUG_ON(c) assert_trace(#c, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, (long)(c)) #define WARN_ON(c) warning_trace(#c, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, (long)(c)) #define ASSERT(c) assert_trace(#c, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, (long)!(c)) #define BUG() assert_trace(NULL, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, 1) #else #define BUG_ON(c) assert(!(c)) #define WARN_ON(c) warning_trace(#c, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, (long)(c)) #define ASSERT(c) assert(!(c)) #define BUG() assert(0) Condition of BUG_ON/ASSERT/BUG are all logical notted for DISABLE_BACKTRACE. While WARN_ON() of both branch are the same condition. This seems quite confusing to me. Any idea to make it more straightforward? Thanks, Qu At 12/05/2016 07:38 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
Hi Qu, Yes, the assert for ifdef BTRFS_DIABLE_BACKTRACE is not correct. The condition should not have a not(!). Thanks for reporting. On 12/05/2016 01:10 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:quoted
Hi, Goldwyn and David, This patch seems to cause btrfs test case 023 to fail. Bisect leads me to this patch. $ ./btrfs check ~/quota_balance_loop_backref.raw.restored Checking filesystem on /home/adam/quota_balance_loop_backref.raw.restored UUID: c33c5ce3-3ad9-4320-9201-c337c04e0051 checking extents btrfs: cmds-check.c:12284: build_roots_info_cache: Assertion `!(ret == 0)' failed. Aborted (core dumped) And gdb backref: #0 0x00007ffff6fd204f in raise () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ffff6fd347a in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x00007ffff6fcaea7 in __assert_fail_base () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 #3 0x00007ffff6fcaf52 in __assert_fail () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 #4 0x0000000000440426 in build_roots_info_cache (info=0x6f43c0) at cmds-check.c:12284 #5 0x0000000000440945 in repair_root_items (info=0x6f43c0) at cmds-check.c:12412 #6 0x00000000004418c3 in cmd_check (argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffe100) at cmds-check.c:12892 #7 0x000000000040a74c in main (argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffe100) at btrfs.c:301 For frame 4: (gdb) frame 4 #4 0x0000000000440426 in build_roots_info_cache (info=0x6f43c0) at cmds-check.c:12284 12284 ASSERT(ret == 0); (gdb) list 12279 rii->cache_extent.start = root_id; 12280 rii->cache_extent.size = 1; 12281 rii->level = (u8)-1; 12282 entry = &rii->cache_extent; 12283 ret = insert_cache_extent(roots_info_cache, entry); 12284 ASSERT(ret == 0); 12285 } else { 12286 rii = container_of(entry, struct root_item_info, 12287 cache_extent); 12288 } (gdb) print ret $1 = 0 For me, ASSERT(ret == 0) seems quite safe and common here. Doesn't the patch changed the ASSERT() behavior? Thanks, Qu At 11/30/2016 12:24 AM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:quoted
From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <redacted> The values passed to BUG_ON/WARN_ON are negated(!) and printed, which results in printing the value zero for each bug/warning. For example: volumes.c:988: btrfs_alloc_chunk: Assertion `ret` failed, value 0 This is not useful. Instead changed to print the value of the parameter passed to BUG_ON()/WARN_ON(). The value needed to be changed to long to accomodate pointers being passed. Also, consolidated assert() and BUG() into ifndef. Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <redacted> --- kerncompat.h | 35 +++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)diff --git a/kerncompat.h b/kerncompat.h index ed9a042..9bd25bd 100644 --- a/kerncompat.h +++ b/kerncompat.h@@ -88,39 +88,36 @@ static inline void print_trace(void) } static inline void assert_trace(const char *assertion, const char*filename, - const char *func, unsigned line, int val) + const char *func, unsigned line, long val) { - if (val) + if (!val) return; if (assertion) - fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d: %s: Assertion `%s` failed, value %d\n", + fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d: %s: Assertion `%s` failed, value %ld\n", filename, line, func, assertion, val); else - fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d: %s: Assertion failed, value %d.\n", + fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d: %s: Assertion failed, value %ld.\n", filename, line, func, val); print_trace(); abort(); exit(1); } -#define BUG() assert_trace(NULL, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, 0) -#else -#define BUG() assert(0) #endif static inline void warning_trace(const char *assertion, const char *filename, - const char *func, unsigned line, int val, + const char *func, unsigned line, long val, int trace) { - if (val) + if (!val) return; if (assertion) fprintf(stderr, - "%s:%d: %s: Warning: assertion `%s` failed, value %d\n", + "%s:%d: %s: Warning: assertion `%s` failed, value %ld\n", filename, line, func, assertion, val); else fprintf(stderr, - "%s:%d: %s: Warning: assertion failed, value %d.\n", + "%s:%d: %s: Warning: assertion failed, value %ld.\n", filename, line, func, val); #ifndef BTRFS_DISABLE_BACKTRACE if (trace)@@ -299,17 +296,15 @@ static inline long IS_ERR(const void *ptr) #define vfree(x) free(x) #ifndef BTRFS_DISABLE_BACKTRACE -#define BUG_ON(c) assert_trace(#c, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, !(c)) -#define WARN_ON(c) warning_trace(#c, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__,!(c), 1) +#define BUG_ON(c) assert_trace(#c, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, (long)(c)) +#define WARN_ON(c) warning_trace(#c, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, (long)(c), 1) +#define ASSERT(c) assert_trace(#c, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, (long)!(c)) +#define BUG() assert_trace(NULL, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, 1) #else #define BUG_ON(c) assert(!(c)) -#define WARN_ON(c) warning_trace(#c, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, !(c), 0) -#endif - -#ifndef BTRFS_DISABLE_BACKTRACE -#define ASSERT(c) assert_trace(#c, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, (c)) -#else -#define ASSERT(c) assert(c) +#define WARN_ON(c) warning_trace(#c, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, (long)(c), 0) +#define ASSERT(c) assert(!(c))This should be assert(c), without the not(!)quoted
quoted
+#define BUG() assert(0) #endif #define container_of(ptr, type, member) ({ \