On 08/24/2016 05:07 AM, Filipe Manana wrote:

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Josef Bacik [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Suppose you have the following tree in snap1 on a file system mounted with -o
inode_cache so that inode numbers are recycled

└── [    258]  a
    └── [    257]  b

and then you remove b, rename a to c, and then re-create b in c so you have the
following tree

└── [    258]  c
    └── [    257]  b

and then you try to do an incremental send you will hit

ASSERT(pending_move == 0);

Hi Josef,

Would you care submitting a regression test for xfstests?
The change looks good to me.

Yeah I sent one yesterday, btrfs/131.  Thanks,

Josef