Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: check: skip shared node or leaf check for low_memory mode
From: David Sterba <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-30 12:10:10
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 07:44:17PM +0800, Wang Xiaoguang wrote:
Hi, On 08/30/2016 07:32 PM, David Sterba wrote:quoted
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 09:50:20AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:quoted
quoted
Are they not? The low-memory patchset has been released in 4.7.1, the devel branch is always on top of master branch. I see both branches pushed to the public git repos so I don't see what you mean.Unfortunately, the low memory mode is not fully merged into devel branch. Only the first part (extent and chunk tree) is merged. The second part(fs tree) is not merged yet. Patches like the following is not in either devel/master branch: Lu Fengqi (13): btrfs-progs: move btrfs_extref_hash() to hash.h btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to find dir_item btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check inode_ref btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check inode_extref btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to find inode_ref btrfs-progs: check: introduce a function to check dir_item btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check file extent btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check inode item btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check fs root btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check root ref btrfs-progs: check: introduce low_memory mode fs_tree check btrfs-progs: check: fix the return value bug of cmd_check() btrfs-progs: check: fix false warning for check_extent_item() So Wang found it confusing and unable to apply his patch to devel branch.He could have replied himself, I think the conversation would feel better when we can talk directly :)Yes, I agree. I was on leave for a while this morning :)
Doh, I may be confused by the names, I mean that I've never seen a mail from 'Lu Fengqi'.