Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 2 authors, 2016-07-05

Re: Bad hard drive - checksum verify failure forces readonly mount

From: Chris Murphy <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-27 16:49:06

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Vasco Almeida [off-list ref] wrote:
File system image available at (choose one link)
https://mega.nz/#!AkAEgKyB!RUa7G5xHIygWm0ALx5ZxQjjXNdFYa7lDRHJ_sW0bWLs
https://www.sendspace.com/file/i70cft


Should I file a bug report with that image dump linked above or btrfs-
debug-tree output or both?
If it were me, I'd include both. Maybe the image is incomplete or vice
versa. The debug tree output is also human readable. I'd also put them
up in a cloud location where you can kinda forget about them for a
while, I've had images not looked at for 6+ months by a dev.

I think I will use the subject of this thread as summary to file the
bug. Can you think of something more suitable or is that fine?
I would try to summarize something like:
file system created with btrfs-progs version -----, and mostly used
with kernel version -----, and inexplicably the file system became
unusable at boot time always mounting only readonly. Newer kernel
versions still could not mount it, nor was btrfs check using
btrfs-progs version ----- able to repair. See thread URL for more
details.

btrfs-image URL
btrfs-debug-tree URL

I think I will reinstall the OS since, even if I manage to recover the
file system from this issue, that OS will be something I can not trust
fully.
Yeah pretty much that's right. There is an rpm command where you can
have it check the signatures of all installed binaries, but I forget
what it is offhand. That'd be an alternative to reinstalling if the
init options were to work.


-- 
Chris Murphy
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help