Re: btrfs goes readonly + No space left on 4.3
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Date: 2016-05-03 18:03:15
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 04:06:05AM +0000, Paul Jones wrote:
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-btrfs- owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Omar Sandoval Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2016 8:06 AM To: Stefan Priebe <redacted> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: btrfs goes readonly + No space left on 4.3 On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:48:15PM +0200, Stefan Priebe wrote:quoted
just want to drop a note that all those ENOSPC msg are gone with v4.5 and space_cache=v2. Any plans to make space_cache=v2 default? Greets, StefanYup, we want to make space_cache=v2 the default at some point. I'm running it on my own machines and testing it here at Facebook and haven't run into any issues yet. Besides stability, I also want to make sure there aren't any performance regressions versus the old free space cache that we haven't thought about yet. Thanks for trying it out :)I have also been testing it and have had no problems. One question I have about it: I use Grub2 to boot my systems directly from a BTRFS root partition (i.e. no separate /boot), I assume Grub shouldn't need to care about free space tree/cache as it's only reading data? I don't know enough about either to know if it's an issue or not. Thanks, Paul.
Yeah, the free space tree doesn't make a difference when the filesystem is used read-only. In fact, you can mount a filesystem with space_cache=v2 enabled read-only on older kernel versions. -- Omar