Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-02-18

RE: btrfs: reada: simplify dev->reada_in_flight processing

From: Zhao Lei <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-18 01:37:47

Hi, Dan Carpenter
From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:02 AM
To: zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: re: btrfs: reada: simplify dev->reada_in_flight processing

Hello Zhao Lei,

The patch 7aff519c04d2: "btrfs: reada: simplify dev->reada_in_flight
processing" from Jan 12, 2016, leads to the following static checker
warning:

	fs/btrfs/reada.c:697 reada_start_machine_dev()
	warn: inconsistent indenting

fs/btrfs/reada.c
   688                  spin_unlock(&fs_info->reada_lock);
   689                  return 0;
   690          }
   691          dev->reada_next = re->logical +
fs_info->tree_root->nodesize;
   692          re->refcnt++;
   693
   694          spin_unlock(&fs_info->reada_lock);
   695
   696          spin_lock(&re->lock);
   697                  if (re->scheduled || list_empty(&re->extctl)) {

This is indented too much.
Thanks for report.

This problem is introduced in patch titled:
btrfs: reada: Move is_need_to_readahead contition earlier

I'll fix it.

CC: David Sterba <redacted>
I'll fix this indent problem in following branch:
https://github.com/zhaoleidd/btrfs.git integration-4.5

Could you pick them again?

Thanks
Zhaolei
   698                          spin_unlock(&re->lock);
   699                          reada_extent_put(fs_info, re);
   700                          return 0;
   701                  }
   702                  re->scheduled = 1;
   703          spin_unlock(&re->lock);
   704

regards,
dan carpenter


Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help