Re: [PATCH 6/7] btrfs-progs: Print warning message if qgroup data is inconsistent.
From: Qu Wenruo <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-01 00:31:59
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] btrfs-progs: Print warning message if qgroup data is inconsistent. From: Filipe David Manana <redacted> To: Qu Wenruo <redacted> Date: 2015年05月30日 19:39
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Qu Wenruo [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Before this patch, qgroup show won't check btrfs qgroup status, so even the INCONSISTENT flags is set, user is not aware of it. This patch will include BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_ITEM in the search range and check the flag, if there is any flag meaning the inconsistence of qgroup data, info user. NOTE: There is several kernel bugs from INCONSISTENT flags is always set to RUNNING flags is not cleared until umount. So this warning will always be here if using a newer kernel fixing these bugs. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <redacted> --- qgroup.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/qgroup.c b/qgroup.c index 7288365..4173846 100644 --- a/qgroup.c +++ b/qgroup.c@@ -1016,6 +1016,20 @@ static void __filter_and_sort_qgroups(struct qgroup_lookup *all_qgroups, n = rb_prev(n); } } + +static inline void print_status_flag_warning(u64 flags) +{ + if (!(flags & BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_ON)) + fprintf(stderr, + "WARNING: Quota disabled, qgroup data may be out of date\n"); + else if (flags & BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN) + fprintf(stderr, + "WARNING: Rescan is running, qgroup data may be incorrect\n");Hi Qu, did you ran xfstests? Did btrfs/022 passed for you? btrfs/022 47s ... - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/022.out.bad) --- tests/btrfs/022.out 2014-11-17 20:59:51.178203000 +0000 +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/022.out.bad 2015-05-30 12:35:55.917146846 +0100 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ QA output created by 022 +WARNING: Rescan is running, qgroup data may be incorrect Silence is golden ... (Run 'diff -u tests/btrfs/022.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/022.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
I'll investigate this bug soon. Thanks, Qu
thanksquoted
+ else if (flags & BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_INCONSISTENT) + fprintf(stderr, + "WARNING: Qgroup data inconsistent, rescan recommended\n"); +} + static int __qgroups_search(int fd, struct qgroup_lookup *qgroup_lookup) { int ret;@@ -1039,7 +1053,7 @@ static int __qgroups_search(int fd, struct qgroup_lookup *qgroup_lookup) sk->tree_id = BTRFS_QUOTA_TREE_OBJECTID; sk->max_type = BTRFS_QGROUP_RELATION_KEY; - sk->min_type = BTRFS_QGROUP_INFO_KEY; + sk->min_type = BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY; sk->max_objectid = (u64)-1; sk->max_offset = (u64)-1; sk->max_transid = (u64)-1;@@ -1070,7 +1084,15 @@ static int __qgroups_search(int fd, struct qgroup_lookup *qgroup_lookup) off); off += sizeof(*sh); - if (sh->type == BTRFS_QGROUP_INFO_KEY) { + if (sh->type == BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY) { + struct btrfs_qgroup_status_item *si; + u64 flags; + + si = (struct btrfs_qgroup_status_item *) + (args.buf + off); + flags = btrfs_stack_qgroup_status_flags(si); + print_status_flag_warning(flags); + } else if (sh->type == BTRFS_QGROUP_INFO_KEY) { info = (struct btrfs_qgroup_info_item *) (args.buf + off); a1 = btrfs_stack_qgroup_info_generation(info); --2.3.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html