Re: [PATCH 1/2 v4] Btrfs: snapshot-aware defrag

On 11/01/2012 10:05 PM, Itaru Kitayama wrote:

Hi Liubo:

The V4 leaves only warnings from btrfs_destroy_inode(). So, you think
it's normal
an "old" extent recorded can be removed from the extent tree by the time
relink_file_extents() invoked?

Yeah, it could be if only we run delayed refs in time.

But I don't think that often happens since we run delayed refs when the amount
reaches its limit(64).

thanks,
liubo

Itaru

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Liu Bo [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The current btrfs-next HEAD actually have included this v4 patch, so
just pull btrfs-next and give it a shot :)

thanks,
liubo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html