Re: [RFC][V2] New attempt to a better "btrfs fi df"
From: Goffredo Baroncelli <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-30 18:14:37
On 2012-10-30 10:42, Michael Kjörling wrote:
On 29 Oct 2012 23:21 +0100, from kreijack@gmail.com (Goffredo Baroncelli):quoted
Hi all,
[...]
One thing, though; what is the difference between "unused" and "unallocated"? If there is no difference, I feel the same word should be used throughout.
I had to use "Unused" instead of "Unallocated" because the first one is shorter. In the tabular output of the command "btrfs fi disk-usage" I have 10 columns available for every fields. 1 columns is used by the space character, so I have only 9 characters available for the description. "Unused" is 6 chars, "Unallocated" is 11 chars.... The only options is to use "Unalloc." (8 chars)... -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5