Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix race with freeze and free space inodes
From: Miao Xie <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-17 05:37:04
On fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:26:20 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
So we start our freeze, somebody comes in and does an fsync() on a file where we have to commit a transaction for whatever reason, and we will deadlock because the freeze is waiting on FS_FREEZE people to stop writing to the file system, but the transaction is waiting for its free space inodes to be written out, which are in turn waiting on sb_start_intwrite while trying to write the file extents. To fix this we'll just skip the sb_start_intwrite() if we TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK since we're being waited on by a transaction commit so we're safe wrt to freeze and this will keep us from deadlocking. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <redacted> --- fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c index c9265a6..ba74dfb 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c@@ -342,7 +342,15 @@ again: if (!h) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); - if (!__sb_start_write(root->fs_info->sb, SB_FREEZE_FS, false)) { + /* + * If we are JOIN_NOLOCK we're already committing a transaction and + * waiting on this guy, so we don't need to do the sb_start_intwrite + * because we're already holding a ref. We need this because we could + * have raced in and did an fsync() on a file which can kick a commit + * and then we deadlock with somebody doing a freeze. + */ + if (type != TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK && + !__sb_start_write(root->fs_info->sb, SB_FREEZE_FS, false)) { if (type == TRANS_JOIN_FREEZE) return ERR_PTR(-EPERM); sb_start_intwrite(root->fs_info->sb);
This patch forgets to deal with it in __btrfs_end_transaction(), or the freeze counter will be wrong. Thanks Miao