Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] bug-fixes and cleanup
From: Liu Bo <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-10 16:29:07
On 09/11/2012 12:20 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 08:01:24PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:quoted
From: Liu Bo <redacted> This is a collection of some posted patches. It is also available in git://github.com/liubogithub/btrfs-work.git for-chris v1->v2: patch 1 (Btrfs: fix a bug of per-file nocow) is the only one to update since we missed the regular file check while others remain unchanged. Liu Bo (5): Btrfs: fix a bug of per-file nocow Btrfs: update delayed ref's tracepoints to show sequence Btrfs: fix a bug in parsing return value in logical resolve Btrfs: use helper for logical resolve Btrfs: use larger limit for translation of logical to inode liubo (1): Btrfs: cleanup for unused ref cache stuff fs/btrfs/backref.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++--------- fs/btrfs/backref.h | 3 ++- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 3 --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 5 ----- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 +-- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 28 ++++++++++------------------ fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 14 ++++++++------ fs/btrfs/send.c | 7 ++++--- include/trace/events/btrfs.h | 14 ++++++++++---- 9 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)If you are only fixing one patch in the series please just post the updated one, I went through and rebased out all the other patches and reapplied them before I realized what you were doing. Thanks,
So sorry for the trouble, I've got the lesson from this. thanks, liubo
Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html