Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2012-08-16

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: trivial code style fix in root-tree.c

From: Wang Sheng-Hui <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-16 13:26:42

On 2012年08月16日 21:23, Arne Jansen wrote:
On 16.08.2012 15:17, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
quoted
Add code indent to the bad styled statements.

Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <redacted>
---
 root-tree.c |   10 ++++------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/root-tree.c b/root-tree.c
index 782472c..39cfef6 100644
--- a/root-tree.c
+++ b/root-tree.c
@@ -182,12 +182,10 @@ int btrfs_del_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root,
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 	if (ret) {
-btrfs_print_leaf(root, path->nodes[0]);
-printk("failed to del %llu %u %llu\n",
-	(unsigned long long)key->objectid,
-	key->type,
-	(unsigned long long)key->offset);
-
I guess Alexander intentionally put in the bad indentation
to remind him to remove this code before submitting the
patch :)
quoted
+		btrfs_print_leaf(root, path->nodes[0]);
+		printk("failed to del %llu %u %llu\n",
+			(unsigned long long)key->objectid, key->type,
+			(unsigned long long)key->offset);
 	}
When I saw the BUG_ON, I wonder do we still need the above branch statement.
It looks just to be helpful for debug - give out some info, right? 
quoted
 	BUG_ON(ret != 0);
 	leaf = path->nodes[0];
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help