Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 6 authors, 2012-10-12

Re: Varying Leafsize and Nodesize in Btrfs

From: Roman Mamedov <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-31 05:02:37

On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:34:49 +0200
Martin Steigerwald [off-list ref] wrote:
I wanted to ask about 32k either.

I used 32k on one 2,5 inch external esata disk. But I never measured 
anything so far.

I wonder what a good value for SSD might be. I tend to not use anymore 
than 16k, but thats just some gut feeling right now. Nothing based on a 
well-founded explaination.
If you look closely at https://oss.oracle.com/~mason/blocksizes/ , you will
notice that 16K delivers almost all of the 32K's performance gains in "Read",
while not suffering from slowdowns that 32K shows in "Create" and "Delete".

I have chosen 16K for my new /home partition (on an SSD+HDD mdadm RAID1).
But what disappointed me at the time, is that one can't seem to have a "mixed"
allocation FS with non-default leaf/node sizes.

-- 
With respect,
Roman

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Stallman had a printer,
with code he could not see.
So he began to tinker,
and set the software free."

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help