Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 4 authors, 2012-06-21

Re: R: Re: Subvolumes and /proc/self/mountinfo

From: Martin Steigerwald <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-21 11:46:44

Am Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2012 schrieb Goffredo Baroncelli:
quoted
quoted
Now we have the possibility to move the kernel near the modules, and
this could lead some interesting possibility: think about different
linux installations, with an own kernel version and an own modules
version; what are the reasons to put together under /boot different
kernel which potential conflicting names ? de facto standard ?
historical reasons ? Nothing wrong here; but also the idea to moving
the kernel under /lib/modules is not so wrong.


No, it is completely, totally and very very seriously wrong.
When a bootloader (and the bioses) will be able to address the whole
diskS, this will change.. Not now
Why not the other way around? /boot/modules-3.4 or so.

But either way, these are different discussions. H. Peter´s question was, 
if I understood correctly, whether to use subvolid or path?

I tend to lean towards subvolid.

Ciao,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help