Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 4 authors, 2012-01-16

Re: Possible btrfs deadlock coused by commit 660d3f6c

From: Josef Bacik <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-16 22:01:42

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 08:45:29PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:26:00AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:53:23AM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
quoted
Hi Josef,

commit 660d3f6cde552323578b85fc5a09a6742f1fe804
Author: Josef Bacik [off-list ref]
Date:   Fri Dec 9 11:18:51 2011 -0500

    Btrfs: fix how we do delalloc reservations and how we free reservations on error

introduced possible deadlock. According to comment before
btrfs_page_mkwrite(), that function is not allowed to take
node->i_mutex .

The problem was detected by Patrick (full lockdep info is provided):
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=72072
during investigating of some other issue (kernel.org bug 42576)
It's not a deadlock since you can't mmap a directory, but I posted a fix for
this to linux-btrfs last week, afaik it's headed to -rc1.  Thanks,
Sigh...  You know, I'm getting really annoyed with the "can't mmap a directory"
bogosity resurfacing every couple of months or so.  No, you can't mmap a
directory.  You also can't bugger a hedgehog, which is about as relevant.

What you *can* do is write(2) on a regular file.  Which will happily grab
->i_mutex (in case of btrfs, that's done in the beginning of
btrfs_file_aio_write()) and eventually get the user pages in (in case of
btrfs, iov_iter_fault_in_readable() from __btrfs_buffered_write() from
btrfs_file_aio_write()).  IOW, you do get pagefaults with ->i_mutex
held.  Which means ->mmap_sem grabbed while holding ->i_mutex.  No
directories involved...
Good point, either way it's been fixed.  Thanks,

Josef
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help