Re: Possible btrfs deadlock coused by commit 660d3f6c
From: Josef Bacik <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-16 22:01:42
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 08:45:29PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:26:00AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:53:23AM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:quoted
Hi Josef, commit 660d3f6cde552323578b85fc5a09a6742f1fe804 Author: Josef Bacik [off-list ref] Date: Fri Dec 9 11:18:51 2011 -0500 Btrfs: fix how we do delalloc reservations and how we free reservations on error introduced possible deadlock. According to comment before btrfs_page_mkwrite(), that function is not allowed to take node->i_mutex . The problem was detected by Patrick (full lockdep info is provided): http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=72072 during investigating of some other issue (kernel.org bug 42576)It's not a deadlock since you can't mmap a directory, but I posted a fix for this to linux-btrfs last week, afaik it's headed to -rc1. Thanks,Sigh... You know, I'm getting really annoyed with the "can't mmap a directory" bogosity resurfacing every couple of months or so. No, you can't mmap a directory. You also can't bugger a hedgehog, which is about as relevant. What you *can* do is write(2) on a regular file. Which will happily grab ->i_mutex (in case of btrfs, that's done in the beginning of btrfs_file_aio_write()) and eventually get the user pages in (in case of btrfs, iov_iter_fault_in_readable() from __btrfs_buffered_write() from btrfs_file_aio_write()). IOW, you do get pagefaults with ->i_mutex held. Which means ->mmap_sem grabbed while holding ->i_mutex. No directories involved...
Good point, either way it's been fixed. Thanks, Josef