Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 4 authors, 2011-08-12

Re: Slow snapshot deletion

From: Simon Kirby <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-12 18:26:11

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:21:44PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:40:36PM -0700, Simon Kirby wrote:
quoted
By chance, does "vmstat 1" or top show a high system cpu% while this is
happening,
Absolutely, usually around 80-90%
...which is perhaps why you had difficult obtaining traces with sysrq-w,
since most of the time there were no D-state processes. Instead, sysrq-l
give a backtrace of each running CPU.
quoted
and if so, does cat /proc/<pid>/stack of the PIDs in R state
sometimes show things under btrfs_run_delayed_refs like
setup_cluster_no_bitmap() and rb_next()?
No, I am not seeing what you describe.  The stack traces are usually
showing what I originally quoted.  I don't know if I've seen
setup_cluster_no_bitmap or rb_* at all.
Ok, oh well. :)

Simon-
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help