Re: processes stuck in llseek
From: Mitch Harder <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-18 16:53:36
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Chris Mason [off-list ref] = wrote:
Excerpts from Mitch Harder's message of 2011-08-18 11:40:17 -0400:quoted
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Li Zefan [off-list ref] wrot=
e:
quoted
quoted
Dan Merillat wrote:quoted
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.=
com> wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Excerpts from Dan Merillat's message of 2011-08-15 23:59:50 -040=
0:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Dan Carpenter sent a patch for this, I'll get it queued up for r=
c3.
quoted
quoted
quoted
Can you send it? =A0I'd like to test it to see if it fixes my sys=
tem.
quoted
quoted
Here it is. http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-btrfs&m=3D131176036219732&w=3D2Doesn't this patch rely on Josef's SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA patch set whi=
ch
quoted
isn't in the kernel yet? http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-btrfs&m=3D130927580606177&w=3D2It does, but the hang was reported on 3.1-rc1, which does have Josef'=
s
code.
Thanks. That gives me some insights regarding the differences between the 'for-linus' and the 'for-linus-merged' branches. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html