Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 5 authors, 2011-08-19

Re: processes stuck in llseek

From: Mitch Harder <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-18 16:53:36
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Chris Mason [off-list ref] =
wrote:
Excerpts from Mitch Harder's message of 2011-08-18 11:40:17 -0400:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Li Zefan [off-list ref] wrot=
e:
quoted
quoted
Dan Merillat wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.=
com> wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Excerpts from Dan Merillat's message of 2011-08-15 23:59:50 -040=
0:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Dan Carpenter sent a patch for this, I'll get it queued up for r=
c3.
quoted
quoted
quoted
Can you send it? =A0I'd like to test it to see if it fixes my sys=
tem.
quoted
quoted
Here it is.

http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-btrfs&m=3D131176036219732&w=3D2
Doesn't this patch rely on Josef's SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA patch set whi=
ch
quoted
isn't in the kernel yet?

http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-btrfs&m=3D130927580606177&w=3D2
It does, but the hang was reported on 3.1-rc1, which does have Josef'=
s
code.
Thanks.

That gives me some insights regarding the differences between the
'for-linus' and the 'for-linus-merged' branches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help