Hallo, Josef,

Du meintest am 16.06.11:

quoted

Thank you - it's nice for all who don't use udev.

Who the hell doesn't use udev?

Me - p.e.
"udev" may be interesting for desktop users, for multimedia computers.  
It's not necessary for a simple server, for a machine where the  
administrator wants to rule instead of "udev".

If the developers of "btrfs" really do mean that "udev" has to run on  
the machine which uses "btrfs" then they have to say so, and they have  
to check wether this (possible) condition is redeemed.

Not only in the "devices" environment.

Viele Gruesse!
Helmut