Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] Balance management

[PATCH v6 0/8] Balance management · Hugo Mills <hidden> · 2011-04-30
[PATCH v6 1/8] btrfs: Balance progress monitoring · Hugo Mills <hidden> · 2011-04-30
[PATCH v6 2/8] btrfs: Cancel filesystem balance · Hugo Mills <hidden> · 2011-04-30
Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] btrfs: Cancel filesystem balance · David Sterba <hidden> · 2011-05-02
[PATCH v6 3/8] btrfs: Factor out enumeration of chunks to a separate function · Hugo Mills <hidden> · 2011-04-30
[PATCH v6 4/8] btrfs: Implement filtered balance ioctl · Hugo Mills <hidden> · 2011-04-30
[PATCH v6 5/8] btrfs: Balance filter for device ID · Hugo Mills <hidden> · 2011-04-30
[PATCH v6 6/8] btrfs: Balance filter for virtual address ranges · Hugo Mills <hidden> · 2011-04-30
[PATCH v6 7/8] btrfs: Replication-type information · Hugo Mills <hidden> · 2011-04-30
[PATCH v6 8/8] btrfs: Balance filter for physical device address · Hugo Mills <hidden> · 2011-04-30
Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] Balance management · David Sterba <hidden> · 2011-05-02

From: David Sterba <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-02 15:54:41

Hi,

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 03:23:55PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:

   One more round of the balance management patches. There's very
little changed from last time -- a compilation issue spotted by David,
two minor checkpatch failures, and a re-spin against the latest
btrfs-unstable. Could you consider these patches for 2.6.40, please?

just went through the patches again, all my comments are in and I'm
giving it a

Reviewed-by: David Sterba <redacted>


david

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help