Re: raid5 - again
From: Hugo Mills <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-19 23:56:00
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:11:30PM +0100, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
It's been some two years since I read about the becoming of raid5 etc in btrfs. Since the code is available in linux, why isn't this already in btrfs? Is Oracle holding back?
It's about resourcing and stability. Oracle only employ one person (AFAIK) on btrfs -- Chris Mason. He does a sterling job of maintaining and developing the filesystem, but there is only one of him. Since well before December, he's been working on a functional fsck, trying to get it to a state where it won't demolish your filesystem even more than it already is. This has left the work to integrate the RAID-5/6 patches behind. He's also been working hard on fixing a great many other stability issues as they're reported, and integrating patches from other developers. I believe that RAID-5/6 is the next major piece of work that Chris is intending to integrate, once fsck is ready. However, stability is better than features at this point. I don't see any commercial benefit in preventing the integration and deployment of the RAID-5/6 patches, but simply that there's other things that are more important. Please be patient. Hugo. -- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- Startle, startle, little twink. How I wonder what you think. ---
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 190 bytes