Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2011-01-25

Re: Defragmentation Not Working with Directory as Argument

From: Mitch Harder <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-25 20:54:40

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Hubert Kario [off-list ref] wrote:
On Monday, January 24, 2011 19:11:07 Mitch Harder wrote:
quoted
Defragmentation is not working when a directory is supplied as the
argument. =A0When a file name is supplied as the argument,
defragmentation works well.

This can be demonstrated as follows:

# mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/btrfs
# cd /mnt/btrfs/
# cp /usr/src/linux/fs/btrfs/zlib.c =A0. =A0 =A0(any suitable file w=
ill do,
quoted
small text files seemed appropriate)
# cp zlib.c fragmented-zlib.c
# btrfs fi sync /mnt/btrfs
# cat zlib.c >> fragmented-zlib.c
# btrfs fi sync /mnt/btrfs
# filefrag zlib.c fragmented-zlib.c
zlib.c: 1 extent found
fragmented-zlib.c: 2 extents found
# btrfs filesystem defragment /mnt/btrfs/
# btrfs fi sync /mnt/btrfs
# filefrag zlib.c fragmented-zlib.c
zlib.c: 1 extent found
fragmented-zlib.c: 2 extents found

Now, supply a filename as the argument

# btrfs filesystem defragment /mnt/btrfs/fragmented-zlib.c
# btrfs fi sync /mnt/btrfs
# filefrag zlib.c fragmented-zlib.c
zlib.c: 1 extent found
fragmented-zlib.c: 1 extent found

I've also tested defragmentation on my normal btrfs filesystems, and
have seen the same results. =A0I've never seen a file defragmented w=
hen
quoted
using a directory as the argument.
That's because this defragments only directory metadata.
quoted
Also, I was wondering if one of the Btrfs developers could clarify t=
he
quoted
intended scope of defragmentation when a directory is supplied as th=
e
quoted
argument.
I submited apropriate patches few days back to update man and help me=
ssages
quoted
I have seen comments on the mailing list indicating that only the
directory supplied is intended to be defragmented, and defragmentati=
on
quoted
will not recurse to subdirectories below.
that's true
quoted
However, if I look at the code, and read the documentation for the
older btrfsctl command (which seems to be the basis for the current
btrfs command), it seems like the intention is to recursively
defragment the entire tree below the directory supplied in the
argument.
Then it looks like the userspace part of implementation changed, don'=
t know
why though.
Thanks!  I see where they've added some clarification on this issue to
the wiki in the Problem FAQ.

https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Problem_FAQ#Defragmenting_a_dir=
ectory_doesn.27t_work

I understand now that the function performed when a directory is
supplied as the argument is different than the function performed when
a file or file wildcard is supplied as the argument.

I'm concerned that there will be a vast number of new btrfs users who
have spent their computer life immersed in the command-line syntax
convention where supplying a directory as an argument implies the
files located in that directory.

It might make sense to break out the defragmentation of leaf metadata
into a separate command so that it's clear to users what operation is
being performed.

It will save a lot of frustration from both the new users who are
learning the new Btrfs concepts and the advanced users who have to
field the questions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help