Re: Btrfs for mainline
From: Chris Mason <hidden>
Date: 2008-12-31 23:19:09
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
From: Chris Mason <hidden>
Date: 2008-12-31 23:19:09
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 10:45 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 06:28:55 -0500 Chris Mason [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hello everyone,Hi!quoted
I've done some testing against Linus' git tree from last night and the current btrfs trees still work well.what's btrfs? I think I've heard the name before, but I've never seen the patches :)
The source is up to around 38k loc, I thought it better to use that http thing for people who were interested in the code. There is also a standalone git repo: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable-standalone.git;a=summary This has only btrfs as a module and would be the fastest way to see the .c files. btrfs doesn't have any changes outside of fs/Makefile and fs/Kconfig (happy new year ;) -chris