Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 8 authors, 2008-05-02

Re: Btrfs v0.14 Released

From: Tim Gardner <hidden>
Date: 2008-05-01 19:36:25
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

Chris Mason wrote:
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Tim Gardner wrote:

[ btrfs oops on ubuntu ]
quoted
quoted
quoted
 This is because ubuntu kernels ship with apparmor, you'll need this
patch:

 If there is a #ifdef IM_A_UBUNTU_KERNEL I can use, I'll do it.  Jeff
Mahoney has a similar patch for SUSE that I've been meaning to merge,
but I wanted to lookup some way to check for ubuntu as well.

 -chris

 diff -r e7da2489b19b file.c
 --- a/file.c    Wed Apr 30 13:59:35 2008 -0400
 +++ b/file.c    Thu May 01 12:25:11 2008 -0400
 @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write(struct f
                goto out_nolock;
        if (count == 0)
                goto out_nolock;
 -       err = remove_suid(fdentry(file));
 +       err = remove_suid(&file->f_path);
        if (err)
                goto out_nolock;
        file_update_time(file);
Couldn't you #ifdef based on CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR ? This ought to
work for Hardy. However the next development kernel (Intrepid) does not
have the APPARMOR patches, so just knowing that its an UBUNTU kernel is
not specific enough.
I've been assuming the apparmor patches change remove_suid even when they are 
not enabled in the config.

-chris
Lets get Kees involved. He developed the patch set for Hardy. I would
hope that if CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR=n then the source would default to
its normal state.

rtg
-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner@ubuntu.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help