Re: Btrfs v0.14 Released
From: Tim Gardner <hidden>
Date: 2008-05-01 19:36:25
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
Chris Mason wrote:
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Tim Gardner wrote: [ btrfs oops on ubuntu ]quoted
quoted
quoted
This is because ubuntu kernels ship with apparmor, you'll need this patch: If there is a #ifdef IM_A_UBUNTU_KERNEL I can use, I'll do it. Jeff Mahoney has a similar patch for SUSE that I've been meaning to merge, but I wanted to lookup some way to check for ubuntu as well. -chris diff -r e7da2489b19b file.c --- a/file.c Wed Apr 30 13:59:35 2008 -0400 +++ b/file.c Thu May 01 12:25:11 2008 -0400 @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write(struct f goto out_nolock; if (count == 0) goto out_nolock; - err = remove_suid(fdentry(file)); + err = remove_suid(&file->f_path); if (err) goto out_nolock; file_update_time(file);Couldn't you #ifdef based on CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR ? This ought to work for Hardy. However the next development kernel (Intrepid) does not have the APPARMOR patches, so just knowing that its an UBUNTU kernel is not specific enough.I've been assuming the apparmor patches change remove_suid even when they are not enabled in the config. -chris
Lets get Kees involved. He developed the patch set for Hardy. I would hope that if CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR=n then the source would default to its normal state. rtg -- Tim Gardner tim.gardner@ubuntu.com