Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btusb: Fix suspend issue for Realtek

From: 陆朱伟 <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-02 09:25:03
Also in: lkml

Hi Marcel,
Got it, thanks.
I will change the patch and resubmit it.

Regards
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btusb: Fix suspend issue for Realtek

Hi Alex,
quoted
From the perspective of controller, global suspend means there is no
SET_FEATURE (DEVICE_REMOTE_WAKEUP) and controller would drop the
firmware. It would consume less power. So we should not send this kind
of SET_FEATURE when host goes to suspend state.
Otherwise, when making device enter selective suspend, host should send
SET_FEATURE to make sure the firmware remains.

Signed-off-by: Alex Lu <redacted>
---
drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 40
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
quoted
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
index 50aed5259c2b..69f6b4208901 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
@@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id
btusb_needs_reset_resume_table[] = {
quoted
#define BTUSB_DIAG_RUNNING	10
#define BTUSB_OOB_WAKE_ENABLED	11
#define BTUSB_HW_RESET_ACTIVE	12
+#define BTUSB_QUIRK_SUSPEND	13
I think this name is not really descriptive. What about
BTUSB_SUSPEND_DISABLE or BTUSB_WAKEUP_DISABLE or
BTUSB_REMOTE_WAKEUP or something that is rather clear.
quoted
struct btusb_data {
	struct hci_dev       *hdev;
@@ -1165,6 +1166,15 @@ static int btusb_open(struct hci_dev *hdev)
	 */
	device_wakeup_enable(&data->udev->dev);

+	/* Disable device remote wakeup when host is suspended
+	 * For Realtek chips, global suspend without
+	 * SET_FEATURE (DEVICE_REMOTE_WAKEUP) can save more power
in device.
quoted
+	 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUSB_RTL
+	if (test_bit(BTUSB_QUIRK_SUSPEND, &data->flags))
+		device_wakeup_disable(&data->udev->dev);
+#endif
+
I have no idea what the #ifdef does here. Limiting it to HCIBTUSB_RTL seems
pointless.
quoted
	if (test_and_set_bit(BTUSB_INTR_RUNNING, &data->flags))
		goto done;
@@ -1227,6 +1237,13 @@ static int btusb_close(struct hci_dev *hdev)
		goto failed;

	data->intf->needs_remote_wakeup = 0;
+
+	/* Enable remote wake up for auto-suspend */
+#ifdef CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUSB_RTL
+	if (test_bit(BTUSB_QUIRK_SUSPEND, &data->flags))
+		data->intf->needs_remote_wakeup = 1;
+#endif
+
Same comment as above. No need for the #ifdef.
quoted
	device_wakeup_disable(&data->udev->dev);
	usb_autopm_put_interface(data->intf);
@@ -3185,11 +3202,11 @@ static int btusb_probe(struct usb_interface
*intf,
quoted
	if (id->driver_info & BTUSB_REALTEK) {
		hdev->setup = btrtl_setup_realtek;

-		/* Realtek devices lose their updated firmware over suspend,
-		 * but the USB hub doesn't notice any status change.
-		 * Explicitly request a device reset on resume.
+		/* Realtek devices lose their updated firmware over global
+		 * suspend that means host doesn't send SET_FEATURE
+		 * (DEVICE_REMOTE_WAKEUP)
		 */
-		interface_to_usbdev(intf)->quirks |=
USB_QUIRK_RESET_RESUME;
quoted
+		set_bit(BTUSB_QUIRK_SUSPEND, &data->flags);
	}
#endif
@@ -3363,6 +3380,21 @@ static int btusb_suspend(struct usb_interface
*intf, pm_message_t message)
quoted
		enable_irq(data->oob_wake_irq);
	}

+#ifdef CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUSB_RTL
+	/* For global suspend, Realtek devices lose the loaded fw
+	 * in them. But for autosuspend, firmware should remain.
+	 * Actually, it depends on whether the usb host sends
+	 * set feature (enable wakeup) or not.
+	 */
+	if (test_bit(BTUSB_QUIRK_SUSPEND, &data->flags)) {
+		if (PMSG_IS_AUTO(message) &&
+		    device_can_wakeup(&data->udev->dev))
+			data->udev->do_remote_wakeup = 1;
+		else if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(message))
+			data->udev->reset_resume = 1;
+	}
+#endif
+
The #ifdef is also not needed here.

Regards

Marcel


------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help