Re: [RFC 2/3] ACPI / scan: Fix enumeration for special UART devices
From: Lukas Wunner <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-09 17:24:06
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 03:46:07PM +0200, Frédéric Danis wrote:
Le 07/09/2017 à 19:25, Marcel Holtmann a écrit :quoted
quoted
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ struct acpi_device_flags {u32 of_compatible_ok:1; u32 coherent_dma:1; u32 cca_seen:1; - u32 spi_i2c_slave:1; + u32 serial_slave:1; u32 reserved:19; };I am not an ACPI expert, but wouldn't we better have a serial_bus_slave here. And the serial_bus_slave can be either UART or I2C? Or have a pretty good commit message explaining why this is serial_slave only.I will rename it. serial_bus_slave can be either SPI, I2C or UART (cf. http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/include/acpi/acrestyp.h#L446).
Another idea would be to describe the *effect*, rather than the devices affected, i.e. something like: - u32 spi_i2c_slave:1; + u32 parent_enumerated:1; such that it could be extended to slaves on a non-serial bus in the future. Thanks, Lukas