Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 5 authors, 2025-08-21

Re: [PATCHv3 3/3] block: avoid cpu_hotplug_lock depedency on freeze_lock

From: Yu Kuai <hidden>
Date: 2025-08-15 08:39:42

Hi,

在 2025/08/15 15:59, Ming Lei 写道:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 09:04:53AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
quoted
Hi,

在 2025/08/15 8:13, Ming Lei 写道:
quoted
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 08:01:11PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
quoted

On 8/14/25 7:08 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 06:27:08PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
quoted

On 8/14/25 6:14 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 01:54:59PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
quoted
A recent lockdep[1] splat observed while running blktest block/005
reveals a potential deadlock caused by the cpu_hotplug_lock dependency
on ->freeze_lock. This dependency was introduced by commit 033b667a823e
("block: blk-rq-qos: guard rq-qos helpers by static key").

That change added a static key to avoid fetching q->rq_qos when
neither blk-wbt nor blk-iolatency is configured. The static key
dynamically patches kernel text to a NOP when disabled, eliminating
overhead of fetching q->rq_qos in the I/O hot path. However, enabling
a static key at runtime requires acquiring both cpu_hotplug_lock and
jump_label_mutex. When this happens after the queue has already been
frozen (i.e., while holding ->freeze_lock), it creates a locking
dependency from cpu_hotplug_lock to ->freeze_lock, which leads to a
potential deadlock reported by lockdep [1].

To resolve this, replace the static key mechanism with q->queue_flags:
QUEUE_FLAG_QOS_ENABLED. This flag is evaluated in the fast path before
accessing q->rq_qos. If the flag is set, we proceed to fetch q->rq_qos;
otherwise, the access is skipped.

Since q->queue_flags is commonly accessed in IO hotpath and resides in
the first cacheline of struct request_queue, checking it imposes minimal
overhead while eliminating the deadlock risk.

This change avoids the lockdep splat without introducing performance
regressions.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/4fdm37so3o4xricdgfosgmohn63aa7wj3ua4e5vpihoamwg3ui@fq42f5q5t5ic/ (local)

Reported-by: Shinichiro Kawasaki <redacted>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/4fdm37so3o4xricdgfosgmohn63aa7wj3ua4e5vpihoamwg3ui@fq42f5q5t5ic/ (local)
Fixes: 033b667a823e ("block: blk-rq-qos: guard rq-qos helpers by static key")
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <redacted>
---
   block/blk-mq-debugfs.c |  1 +
   block/blk-rq-qos.c     |  9 ++++---
   block/blk-rq-qos.h     | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
   include/linux/blkdev.h |  1 +
   4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
index 7ed3e71f2fc0..32c65efdda46 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ static const char *const blk_queue_flag_name[] = {
   	QUEUE_FLAG_NAME(SQ_SCHED),
   	QUEUE_FLAG_NAME(DISABLE_WBT_DEF),
   	QUEUE_FLAG_NAME(NO_ELV_SWITCH),
+	QUEUE_FLAG_NAME(QOS_ENABLED),
   };
   #undef QUEUE_FLAG_NAME
diff --git a/block/blk-rq-qos.c b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
index b1e24bb85ad2..654478dfbc20 100644
--- a/block/blk-rq-qos.c
+++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
   #include "blk-rq-qos.h"
-__read_mostly DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(block_rq_qos);
-
   /*
    * Increment 'v', if 'v' is below 'below'. Returns true if we succeeded,
    * false if 'v' + 1 would be bigger than 'below'.
@@ -319,8 +317,8 @@ void rq_qos_exit(struct request_queue *q)
   		struct rq_qos *rqos = q->rq_qos;
   		q->rq_qos = rqos->next;
   		rqos->ops->exit(rqos);
-		static_branch_dec(&block_rq_qos);
   	}
+	blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_QOS_ENABLED, q);
   	mutex_unlock(&q->rq_qos_mutex);
   }
@@ -346,7 +344,7 @@ int rq_qos_add(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct gendisk *disk, enum rq_qos_id id,
   		goto ebusy;
   	rqos->next = q->rq_qos;
   	q->rq_qos = rqos;
-	static_branch_inc(&block_rq_qos);
+	blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_QOS_ENABLED, q);
One stupid question: can we simply move static_branch_inc(&block_rq_qos)
out of queue freeze in rq_qos_add()?

What matters is just the 1st static_branch_inc() which switches the counter
from 0 to 1, when blk_mq_freeze_queue() guarantees that all in-progress code
paths observe q->rq_qos as NULL. That means static_branch_inc(&block_rq_qos)
needn't queue freeze protection.
I thought about it earlier but that won't work because we have
code paths freezing queue before it reaches upto rq_qos_add(),
For instance:

We have following code paths from where we invoke
rq_qos_add() APIs with queue already frozen:

ioc_qos_write()
   -> blkg_conf_open_bdev_frozen() => freezes queue
   -> blk_iocost_init()
     -> rq_qos_add()

queue_wb_lat_store()  => freezes queue
   -> wbt_init()
    -> rq_qos_add()
The above two shouldn't be hard to solve, such as, add helper
rq_qos_prep_add() for increasing the static branch counter.
I thought about this, we'll need some return value to know if rq_qos
is really added and I feel code will be much complex. We'll need at
least two different APIs for cgroup based policy iocost/iolatency and
pure rq_qos policy wbt.
Yes, but not too bad, such as:

diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
index 5bfd70311359..05b13235ebb3 100644
--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -3227,6 +3227,8 @@ static ssize_t ioc_qos_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *input,
  
  	blkg_conf_init(&ctx, input);
  
+	rq_qos_prep_add();
+
  	memflags = blkg_conf_open_bdev_frozen(&ctx);
  	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(memflags)) {
  		ret = memflags;
@@ -3344,7 +3346,7 @@ static ssize_t ioc_qos_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *input,
  	if (enable)
  		wbt_disable_default(disk);
  	else
-		wbt_enable_default(disk);
+		wbt_enable_default(disk, false);
  
  	blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(disk->queue);
  
@@ -3356,6 +3358,7 @@ static ssize_t ioc_qos_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *input,
  	ret = -EINVAL;
  err:
  	blkg_conf_exit_frozen(&ctx, memflags);
+	rq_qos_prep_del();
  	return ret;
  }
This is not enough for iocost:

1) ioc_qos_write() can be called with iocost already registered, we need
to call rq_qos_prep_del() in the succeed branch as well.
2) ioc_cost_model_write() have to have the same treatment.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
  
diff --git a/block/blk-rq-qos.c b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
index 848591fb3c57..27047f661e3f 100644
--- a/block/blk-rq-qos.c
+++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ void rq_qos_exit(struct request_queue *q)
  		struct rq_qos *rqos = q->rq_qos;
  		q->rq_qos = rqos->next;
  		rqos->ops->exit(rqos);
-		static_branch_dec(&block_rq_qos);
+		rq_qos_prep_del();
  	}
  	mutex_unlock(&q->rq_qos_mutex);
  }
@@ -346,7 +346,6 @@ int rq_qos_add(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct gendisk *disk, enum rq_qos_id id,
  		goto ebusy;
  	rqos->next = q->rq_qos;
  	q->rq_qos = rqos;
-	static_branch_inc(&block_rq_qos);
  
  	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q, memflags);
  
diff --git a/block/blk-rq-qos.h b/block/blk-rq-qos.h
index 39749f4066fb..38572a7eb2b7 100644
--- a/block/blk-rq-qos.h
+++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.h
@@ -179,4 +179,14 @@ static inline void rq_qos_queue_depth_changed(struct request_queue *q)
  
  void rq_qos_exit(struct request_queue *);
  
+static inline void rq_qos_prep_add(void)
+{
+	static_branch_inc(&block_rq_qos);
+}
+
+static inline void rq_qos_prep_del(void)
+{
+	static_branch_dec(&block_rq_qos);
+}
+
  #endif
Wonder can we simplify this, we already have a disk level lock
rq_qos_mutex, that is held before freeze queue for iocost and iolatency,
and we can grab it before freeze queue for wbt as well, then we can just
do the static_branch_inc/dec with rq_qos_mutex held easily since
everything is serialized.

+static inline bool rq_qos_prep_add(struct request_queue *q, enum 
rq_qos_id id)
+{
+       lockdep_assert_held(q->rq_qos_mutex);
+
+       if (!rq_qos_id(q, id)) {
+               static_branch_inc(&block_rq_qos);
+               return true;
+       }
+
+       return false;
+}
+
+/* paired with rq_qos_prep_add */
+static inline bool rq_qos_prep_del(struct request_queue *q, enum 
rq_qos_id id, bool prepared)
+{
+       lockdep_assert_held(q->rq_qos_mutex);
+
+       if (prepared && !rq_qos_id(q, id))
+               static_branch_dec(&block_rq_qos);
+}
+
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help