Thread (72 messages) 72 messages, 3 authors, 2025-04-11

Re: Why use plain numbers and totals rather than predef'd constants for RPC sizes?

From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <hidden>
Date: 2025-03-20 21:48:26
Also in: ceph-devel, linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 14:59 +0000, David Howells wrote:
Viacheslav Dubeyko [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
-	dbuf = ceph_databuf_reply_alloc(1, 8 + sizeof(struct ceph_timespec), GFP_NOIO);
-	if (!dbuf)
+	request = ceph_databuf_reply_alloc(1, 8 + sizeof(struct ceph_timespec), GFP_NOIO);
Ditto. Why do we have 8 + sizeof(struct ceph_timespec) here?
Because that's the size of the composite protocol element.

As to why it's using a total of plain integers and sizeofs rather than
constant macros, Ilya is the person to ask according to git blame;-).

I would probably prefer sizeof(__le64) here over 8, but I didn't want to
change it too far from the existing code.

If you want macro constants for these sorts of things, someone else who knows
the protocol better needs to do that.  You could probably write something to
generate them (akin to rpcgen).
Yes, make sense. I totally agree with you. :)

Thanks,
Slava.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help