Re: [PATCH blktests v3 1/6] common/xfs: ignore first umount error on _xfs_mkfs_and_mount()
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-02-12 21:07:25
Also in:
linux-patches
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-02-12 21:07:25
Also in:
linux-patches
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 12:58:36PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 2/12/25 12:54 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:quoted
We want to help capture error messages with _xfs_mkfs_and_mount() on $FULL, to do that we should avoid spamming error messages for things which we know are not fatal. Such is the case of when we try to mkfs a filesystem but before that try to umount the target path. The first umount is just for sanity, so ignore the error messages from it. Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> --- common/xfs | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/common/xfs b/common/xfs index 569770fecd53..67a3b8a97391 100644 --- a/common/xfs +++ b/common/xfs@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ _xfs_mkfs_and_mount() { local mount_dir=$2 mkdir -p "${mount_dir}" - umount "${mount_dir}" + umount "${mount_dir}" >/dev/null 2>&1 mkfs.xfs -l size=64m -f "${bdev}" || return $? mount "${bdev}" "${mount_dir}" }Shouldn't ">/dev/null 2>&1" be added to the _xfs_mkfs_and_mount() caller rather than inside the _xfs_mkfs_and_mount() implementation? The above patch makes it impossible for any caller to capture the stdout output of umount.
That is the point. In this case the umount *can* fail, we do it for sanity purposes. We don't care if umount failed. Luis