Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Large folios in block buffered IO path
From: Bharata B Rao <hidden>
Date: 2024-11-28 11:24:05
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
On 28-Nov-24 10:07 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
On 28-Nov-24 9:52 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:quoted
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 09:31:50AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:quoted
However a point of concern is that FIO bandwidth comes down drastically after the change. default inode_lock-fix rw=30% Instance 1 r=55.7GiB/s,w=23.9GiB/s r=9616MiB/s,w=4121MiB/s Instance 2 r=38.5GiB/s,w=16.5GiB/s r=8482MiB/s,w=3635MiB/s Instance 3 r=37.5GiB/s,w=16.1GiB/s r=8609MiB/s,w=3690MiB/s Instance 4 r=37.4GiB/s,w=16.0GiB/s r=8486MiB/s,w=3637MiB/sSomething this dramatic usually only happens when you enable a debugging option. Can you recheck that you're running both A and B with the same debugging options both compiled in, and enabled?It is the same kernel tree with and w/o Mateusz's inode_lock changes to block/fops.c. I see the config remains same for both the builds. Let me get a run for both base and patched case w/o running perf lock contention to check if that makes a difference.
Without perf lock contention
default inode_lock-fix
rw=30%
Instance 1 r=54.6GiB/s,w=23.4GiB/s r=11.4GiB/s,w=4992MiB/s
Instance 2 r=52.7GiB/s,w=22.6GiB/s r=11.4GiB/s,w=4981MiB/s
Instance 3 r=53.3GiB/s,w=22.8GiB/s r=12.7GiB/s,w=5575MiB/s
Instance 4 r=37.7GiB/s,w=16.2GiB/s r=10.4GiB/s,w=4581MiB/s
Regards, Bharata.