Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] xfs: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Date: 2024-08-22 20:44:09
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs, lkml
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 07:04:02PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
On 21/08/2024 18:11, Darrick J. Wong wrote:quoted
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 09:48:00AM +0000, John Garry wrote:quoted
For when an inode is enabled for atomic writes, set FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE flag. Only direct IO is currently supported, so check for that also. We rely on the block layer to reject atomic writes which exceed the bdev request_queue limits, so don't bother checking any such thing here. Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> --- fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c index 9b6530a4eb4a..3489d478809e 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c@@ -1149,6 +1149,18 @@ xfs_file_remap_range( return remapped > 0 ? remapped : ret; } +static bool xfs_file_open_can_atomicwrite( + struct inode *inode, + struct file *file) +{ + struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode); + + if (!(file->f_flags & O_DIRECT)) + return false; + + return xfs_inode_has_atomicwrites(ip);...and here too. I do like the shift to having an incore flag that controls whether you get untorn write support or not.Do you mean that add a new member to xfs_inode to record this? If yes, it sounds ok, but we need to maintain consistency (of that member) whenever anything which can affect it changes, which is always a bit painful.
I actually meant something more like:
static bool
xfs_file_open_can_atomicwrite(
struct file *file,
struct inode *inode)
{
struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode);
struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
struct xfs_buftarg *target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);
if (!(file->f_flags & O_DIRECT))
return false;
if (!xfs_inode_has_atomicwrites(ip))
return false;
if (mp->m_dalign && (mp->m_dalign % ip->i_extsize))
return false;
if (mp->m_swidth && (mp->m_swidth % ip->i_extsize))
return false;
if (mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize < target->bt_bdev_awu_min)
return false;
if (xfs_inode_alloc_unitsize(ip) > target->bt_bdev_awu_max)
return false;
return true;
}
--D
John