Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram: Replace bit spinlocks with a spinlock_t.
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2024-08-08 09:03:21
Also in:
lkml
On 2024-07-05 14:49:13 [+0200], To linux-block@vger.kernel.org wrote: Hi,
this is follow up to the previous posting, making the lock unconditionally. The original problem with bit spinlock is that it disabled preemption and the following operations (within the atomic section) perform operations that may sleep on PREEMPT_RT. Mike expressed that he would like to keep using zram on PREEMPT_RT. v2…v3 https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240620153556.777272-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de/ (local) - Do "size_t index" within the for loop.
Can this be applied, please? Or v2 ;) Sebastian