Thread (145 messages) 145 messages, 11 authors, 2024-04-16

Re: [PATCH v2 29/34] bdev: make struct bdev_handle private to the block layer

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: 2024-02-01 10:54:24
Also in: linux-fsdevel

On Tue 23-01-24 14:26:46, Christian Brauner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Some comments below...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -795,15 +813,15 @@ static void bdev_yield_write_access(struct block_device *bdev, blk_mode_t mode)
 }
 
 /**
- * bdev_open_by_dev - open a block device by device number
- * @dev: device number of block device to open
+ * bdev_open - open a block device
+ * @bdev: block device to open
  * @mode: open mode (BLK_OPEN_*)
  * @holder: exclusive holder identifier
  * @hops: holder operations
+ * @bdev_file: file for the block device
  *
- * Open the block device described by device number @dev. If @holder is not
- * %NULL, the block device is opened with exclusive access.  Exclusive opens may
- * nest for the same @holder.
+ * Open the block device. If @holder is not %NULL, the block device is opened
+ * with exclusive access.  Exclusive opens may nest for the same @holder.
  *
  * Use this interface ONLY if you really do not have anything better - i.e. when
  * you are behind a truly sucky interface and all you are given is a device
      ^^^
I guess this part of comment is stale now?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -902,7 +897,22 @@ struct bdev_handle *bdev_open_by_dev(dev_t dev, blk_mode_t mode, void *holder,
 	handle->bdev = bdev;
 	handle->holder = holder;
 	handle->mode = mode;
-	return handle;
+
+	/*
+	 * Preserve backwards compatibility and allow large file access
+	 * even if userspace doesn't ask for it explicitly. Some mkfs
+	 * binary needs it. We might want to drop this workaround
+	 * during an unstable branch.
+	 */
Heh, I think the sentense "We might want to drop this workaround during an
unstable branch." does not need to be moved as well :)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+	bdev_file->f_flags |= O_LARGEFILE;
+	bdev_file->f_mode |= FMODE_BUF_RASYNC | FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT;
+	if (bdev_nowait(bdev))
+		bdev_file->f_mode |= FMODE_NOWAIT;
+	bdev_file->f_mapping = handle->bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping;
+	bdev_file->f_wb_err = filemap_sample_wb_err(bdev_file->f_mapping);
+	bdev_file->private_data = handle;
+
+	return 0;
 put_module:
 	module_put(disk->fops->owner);
 abort_claiming:
@@ -910,11 +920,8 @@ struct bdev_handle *bdev_open_by_dev(dev_t dev, blk_mode_t mode, void *holder,
 		bd_abort_claiming(bdev, holder);
 	mutex_unlock(&disk->open_mutex);
 	disk_unblock_events(disk);
-put_blkdev:
-	blkdev_put_no_open(bdev);
-free_handle:
 	kfree(handle);
-	return ERR_PTR(ret);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static unsigned blk_to_file_flags(blk_mode_t mode)
@@ -954,29 +961,35 @@ struct file *bdev_file_open_by_dev(dev_t dev, blk_mode_t mode, void *holder,
 				   const struct blk_holder_ops *hops)
 {
 	struct file *bdev_file;
-	struct bdev_handle *handle;
+	struct block_device *bdev;
 	unsigned int flags;
+	int ret;
 
-	handle = bdev_open_by_dev(dev, mode, holder, hops);
-	if (IS_ERR(handle))
-		return ERR_CAST(handle);
+	ret = bdev_permission(dev, 0, holder);
				   ^^ Maybe I'm missing something but why
do you pass 0 mode here?

+	if (ret)
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
+
+	bdev = blkdev_get_no_open(dev);
+	if (!bdev)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
 
 	flags = blk_to_file_flags(mode);
-	bdev_file = alloc_file_pseudo_noaccount(handle->bdev->bd_inode,
+	bdev_file = alloc_file_pseudo_noaccount(bdev->bd_inode,
 			blockdev_mnt, "", flags | O_LARGEFILE, &def_blk_fops);
 	if (IS_ERR(bdev_file)) {
-		bdev_release(handle);
+		blkdev_put_no_open(bdev);
 		return bdev_file;
 	}
-	ihold(handle->bdev->bd_inode);
+	bdev_file->f_mode &= ~FMODE_OPENED;
Hum, why do you need these games with FMODE_OPENED? I suspect you want to
influence fput() behavior but then AFAICT we will leak dentry, mnt, etc. on
error? If this is indeed needed, it deserves a comment...
-	bdev_file->f_mode |= FMODE_BUF_RASYNC | FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT;
-	if (bdev_nowait(handle->bdev))
-		bdev_file->f_mode |= FMODE_NOWAIT;
-
-	bdev_file->f_mapping = handle->bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping;
-	bdev_file->f_wb_err = filemap_sample_wb_err(bdev_file->f_mapping);
-	bdev_file->private_data = handle;
+	ihold(bdev->bd_inode);
+	ret = bdev_open(bdev, mode, holder, hops, bdev_file);
+	if (ret) {
+		fput(bdev_file);
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
+	}
+	/* Now that thing is opened. */
+	bdev_file->f_mode |= FMODE_OPENED;
 	return bdev_file;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(bdev_file_open_by_dev);
								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara [off-list ref]
SUSE Labs, CR
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help